BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL

                                                                                                                               13.7 - Attachment 1

 

bsc_logo_150dpi_rgb

 

 

 

 

Planning proposal

for short term rental accommodationtourism related land use table and clause changes

 in Byron Shire

(Byron Shire Council)

Authority ref:  26.2015.4.1

V21 GATEWAY VERSIONatewayFinal Version (#E2016/793015/46916215)
(Authority ref:  26.2015.5.1)

15 JulyULY 20156 January 2016

DPE reference PP_2015_xxx


 

 

This page has been intentionally left blank


Part 1     Introduction.. 1

Purpose. 1

Property details and existing zones. 2

Background.. 2

Part 2       Explanation of provisions. 3

Part 3       Justification.. 45

Section A - Need for the planning proposal 45

1      Is the planning proposal a result of any strategic study or report?. 45

2      Is the planning proposal the best means of achieving the objectives or intended outcomes, or is there a better way?. 45

3      Is there a net community benefit?. 45

Section B - Relationship to strategic planning framework. 45

1      Is the planning proposal consistent with the objectives and actions contained within the applicable regional or sub-regional strategy (in this case the Far North Coast Regional Strategy)?. 45

2      Is the planning proposal consistent with the local Council’s Community Strategic Plan, or other local strategic plan?. 55

3      Is the planning proposal consistent with the applicable State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs)?. 56

4      Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (s117 Directions)?  66

Section C -  Environmental, social and economic impact 2322

1      Is there any likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats will be adversely affected as a result of the proposal?. 2322

2      Are there any other likely environmental effects as a result of the planning proposal and how are they proposed to be managed?. 2322

3      How has the planning proposal adequately addressed any social and economic effects?  2322

Section D - State and Commonwealth interests. 2322

1      Is there adequate public infrastructure for the planning proposal?. 2322

2      What are the views of State and Commonwealth public authorities consulted in accordance with the gateway determination?. 2322

Part 4       Mapping.. 2524

Part 5       Community consultation.. 2524

Part 6       Project timeline. 2524

Summary and conclusions. 2524

 

Appendix 1 – Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan

Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.Appendix 2 - Holiday Letting Strategy Discussion Paper

Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.Appendix 3 - Draft Short Term Holiday Accommodation Strategy


BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL

                                                                                                                               13.7 - Attachment 1

 

Part 1   Introduction

Purpose

The purpose of this planning proposal is to introduce a special provision to define and then require development consent for short term rental accommodation. It also establishes the circumstances in which short term rental accommodation would be exempt development.

At the Byron Shire Council meeting of 30 April 2015 Council considered the need to amend its new LEP to permit short term rental accommodation and resolved as follows:

The purpose of this planning proposal is to amend the land use tables for the B4 Mixed Use, RU1 Primary Production and RU2 Rural Landscape zones in relation to serviced apartments and tourist and visitor accommodation and make minor clause amendments relating to bed and breakfast accommodation.

At the Byron Shire Council meeting of 30 April 2015 Council considered the need to amend its new LEP to improve the way it deals with certain types of tourism development and resolved as follows:

15-186       Resolved that Council:

 

1.    Adopt the Byron Shire Short Term Holiday Accommodation Action Plan, Attachment 1 (E2015/14847) subject to the following amendments:

 

a)    amend the planning controls to remove all references to ‘40m’ limitation applying to  occupiers of separate dwellings in relation to making complaints about the short term  rental activities taking place on a property (eg. at Action 5c in the Plan);

b)    further amend the planning controls at Action 6c in the Plan to change “$250/adult” to  “$250 per adult”;

c)    amend the planning controls relating to signage to read: ‘An A3 size sign, in accordance with Council’s template, is to be placed where it can clearly be seen from the public domain (eg footpath) advising the public of the land owner's or property manager's details including telephone number in 40mm font to enable complaints to be readily made, and wording to advise that the property is ‘Registered with Byron Shire Council’;

d)    include a new action ‘Develop Signage Template for use by landowners/managers in accordance with the planning controls. Timeframe: prior to LEP amendments being gazetted. Cost: existing budget’;

e)    change the Actions to ensure that for dwellings (of any size)where the dominant use of the dwelling is short term rental accommodation, development consent is required and other references in the documents be adjusted accordingly;

f)     clarify wherever needed, that the standard is the total number of occupants being no more than the equivalent of 2people per bedroom; and

g)    exclude from the calculation of total number of occupants children under 5 years of age.

2.      Prepare a planning proposal to amend Byron LEP 2014 in accordance with the proposed planning controls in Attachment 1 (E2015/14847) amended as in part 1 above and submit  the planning proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway  Determination.

 

3.      Request the Department of Planning and Environment to delegate to Council the preparation and making of the LEP amendment.

 

4.      Publicly exhibit the proposed amendments to DCP 2014 in Attachment 1 (E2015/14847)

 

The first two recommendations of the Byron Shire Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan are being dealt with in a separate planning proposal.  The recommendations of the Byron Shire Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan that are being dealt with in this planning proposal are:

·     Insert Serviced Apartments in Zone B4 Mixed Use as permissible with development consent

·     Insert Tourist and Visitor Accommodation in the RU2 and RU1 Zones as permissible with consent, and list Hotel or Motel Accommodation, Backpackers Accommodation and Serviced Apartments as prohibited

·     Amend clause 5.4 (1) Bed and Breakfast Accommodation to increase the number of bedrooms from no more than 3 to no more than 5 bedrooms

·     Insert exempt provisions in Schedule 2 for 1 bedroom bed and breakfast establishments to enable development such as Air B&Bs.

 

 

The first two recommendations of the Byron Shire Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan are that:

·            Council insert exempt provisions in Schedule 2 (LEP 2014) for Short Term Rental Accommodation

·            Council insert new clause 6.10 Short Term Rental Accommodation (LEP 2014), as detailed below to enable development applications.

Property details and existing zones

This planning proposal directly affects all land within zones B4 Mixed Use, RU1 Primary Production and RU2 Rural Landscape zones.  It also affects the following zones where Bed and Breakfast Accommodation is a permitted use - RU1 Primary Production, RU2 Rural Landscape, RU5 Village, R2 Low Density Residential, R3 Medium Density Residential, R5 Large Lot Residential, B2 Local Centre, B4 Mixed Use, and SP3 Tourist.

This planning proposal directly affects all land within zones where dwelling houses are permitted under Byron LEP 2014.  This currently includes RU1 Primary Production, RU2 Rural Landscape, RU5 Village, R2 Low Density Residential, R3 Medium Density Residential, R5 large Lot Residential, and B4 Mixed Use.

Background

The Byron Shire Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan is the culmination of a process to develop structure and planning controls around the long practiced use of holiday letting dwellings in Byron Shire.  The process commenced in 2013 with key stakeholder workshops that continued into 2014.  From these workshops a Discussion Paper was prepared for key stakeholder’s consideration.  Comments on the Discussion Paper then led to the development of a Draft Short Term Holiday Accommodation Strategy that was publicly exhibited from 11 November to 22 December 2014.  Over 150 submissions were received including two from state government agencies (DPE and RFS).  Council considered a report on the submissions at the 30 April 2015 meeting.  The decision to amend LEP 2014 was made at that meeting.

The Byron Shire Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan is at Appendix 1.  Other recommendations from this Action Plan will be implemented over time.


 

Part 2   Explanation of provisions

The intended outcomes are to be achieved by an amendment to Byron Shire Council LEP 2014 as follows:

·     Insert Serviced Apartments in the Zone B4 Mixed Use land use table as permissible with development consent

·     Insert Tourist and Visitor Accommodation in the RU2 Rural Landscape  and RU1 Primary Production land use tables as permissible with consent, and list Hotel or Motel Accommodation, Backpackers Accommodation and Serviced Apartments as prohibited

·     Amend clause 5.4 (1) Bed and Breakfast Accommodation to increase the number of bedrooms from no more than 3 to no more than 5 bedrooms

·     Insert exempt provisions in Schedule 2 for 1 bedroom bed and breakfast establishments, as detailed below, to enable development such as Air B&Bs.

“Bed and Breakfast Accommodation

1.    No more than one guest bedroom;

2.    A maximum of two guests;

3.    Offer at least breakfast to guests;

4.    Owner or operator to be a permanent resident of the dwelling;

5.    Register the use of the dwelling on Council’s register prior to commencement and maintain registration;

6.    The accommodation to be provided within the dwelling; no guest accommodation to be provided within secondary dwellings, sheds, tents, caravans or other structures or vehicles on the site;

7.    Guest parking to be provided on site (stacked parking within the driveway permitted); and

8.    Prior to commencement, where the dwelling is located on mapped bushfire prone land, a bushfire safety authority under Section 100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997 shall be obtained and all conditions of the Bushfire Safety Authority must be complied with.

8.    Prior to commencement a Bushfire Safety Authority under S.100B of the RFS Act 1997 is required on land identified as bush fire prone”

 

The intended outcomes are to be achieved by an amendment to Byron Shire Council LEP 2014 as follows:

·            Insert a new clause 6.10 into Byron Shire LEP 2014, Part 6, Additional Local Provisions to require consent for Short Term Rental Accommodation as follows:

 

6.10 Short Term Rental Accommodation

(1)     The objective of this clause is to require development consent for the temporary use of a dwelling as short term rental accommodation,

(2)     The subject dwelling must be located in a zone where dwellings are permitted under Byron LEP 2014,

(3)     In this clause short term rental accommodation is an existing dwelling that provides short term accommodation to tourists and visitors on a commercial basis,

(4)     Only where the use of the dwelling for short term rental accommodation is dominant to its use as residential accommodation or it cannot meet the exempt provisions

(5)     Despite any other provision of this Plan, development consent may be granted for the use of a dwelling as short term rental accommodation,

(6)     The maximum number of occupants is 2 per bedroom, excluding children under 5 years of age.

 

And

 

·            Insert exempt provisions in Schedule 2 (LEP 2014) for certain Short Term Rental Accommodation in order that in some circumstances it can be undertaken as exempt development as follows:

 

Short Term Rental Accommodation

(1)     In this clause short term rental accommodation is an existing dwelling that provides short term accommodation to tourists and visitors on a commercial basis, for less than 90 days in any one calendar year

(2)     The subject dwelling must be located in a zone where dwellings are permitted under Byron LEP 2014,

(3)     The dwelling must not contain more than 3 bedrooms,

Note: where dwellings are designed with studies / offices and other areas capable of being utilised as separate sleeping quarters these may be counted as bedrooms

(4)     The maximum number of occupants is 2 per bedroom, excluding children under 5 years of age,

(5)     Garbage and recycling bins to be provided, serviced and managed on a regular basis,

(6)     If the development is part of a community or strata scheme, the development must have the prior written approval of the owners’ corporation for that scheme,

(7)     Prior to commencement a Bushfire Safety Authority under S.100B of the RFS Act 1997 is required on land identified as bush fire prone,

Note: Any approval from the RFS under this section of the act would require investigation of the need for an evacuation plan

(8)     The dwelling must have hard wired smoke alarms, evacuation lighting, fire blanket and extinguisher in kitchen,

(9)     Carparking to comply with Part B4 Byron Shire DCP 2014,

(10)   There must be no more than 2 substantiated complaints to the Council concerning the short term rental activities taking place on the property from the occupiers of separate dwellings located within the proximity of the subject dwelling within the preceding 12 months,

(11)   The use of the dwelling for short term rental accommodation is to not impact on the residential amenity expected to be enjoyed by surrounding residents. Use to comply with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and associated Noise Regulations,

Comment: consistent with controls that may be applied to STRA that requires a development application.

(12)   The owner/manager must register the use of the dwelling for short term rental accommodation on Council’s register prior to the initial period used,

(13)   The use of the dwelling for short term rental accommodation must comply with the Holiday Rental Code of Conduct endorsed by the Department of Planning,

(14)   The land owner or appointed property manager (eg Real Estate Agent) must be contactable 24 hours 7 days a week and to be able to respond within 30 minutes to complaints regarding the action of tenants and in particular issues pertaining to noise and residential amenity,

(15)   An A3 size sign, in accordance with Council’s template, is to be placed where it can clearly be seen from the public domain (eg footpath) advising the public of the land owner’s or property manager’s details including telephone number in 40mm font to enable complaints to be readily made and wording to advise that the property is ‘Registered with Byron Shire Council’,

(16)   Additional accommodation is not to be provided on site by way of tents, (including tee pees) caravans, campervans or the like,

(17)   Outdoor areas including swimming pools, spas, outdoor decking and balconies are not to be used between the hours of 10pm and 8am,

(18)   Visitors permitted at a property are not to exceed 6 persons between 8am and 10pm and no visitors are permitted after 10pm.

 

 


 

Part 3   Justification

Section A           Need for the planning proposal

1        Is the planning proposal a result of any strategic study or report?

Yes.  In May 2014 Council released a Holiday Letting Strategy Discussion Paper for public comments and consideration.  This was followed by a draft Short Term Holiday Accommodation Strategy and more recently the Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan.  The planning proposal is a recommendation of the most recent document and part of a strategic approach to tourism accommodation issues in Byron Shire.  See Attachment 1.

Yes.  In May 2014 Council released a Holiday Letting Strategy Discussion Paper for public comments and consideration.  This was followed by a draft Short Term Holiday Accommodation Strategy and more recently the Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan.  The planning proposal is a recommendation of the most recent document and part of a strategic approach to solving a long standing issue in Byron Shire.  See Attachments 1, 2 and 3.

2        Is the planning proposal the best means of achieving the objectives or intended outcomes, or is there a better way?

A planning proposal is considered to be the only way to amend land use tables for various zones, amend clause 5.4 and amend Schedule 2 to LEP 2014. It is part of a suite of actions that include DCP amendments, information, compliance, registers, and a code of conduct for operators.

A planning proposal is considered to be the only way to add a new clause and amend Schedule 2 to LEP 2014. It is part of a suite of actions that include information, compliance, registers, signage, and a code of conduct for operators.

3        Is there a net community benefit?

The Net Community Benefit Criteria is identified in the NSW Government’s publication The Right Place for Business and Services.  Assessment against the Net Community Benefit Assessment Criteria is not appropriate for a planning proposal that deals with short term holiday letting.

The Net Community Benefit (NCB) Criteria is identified in the NSW Government’s publication Draft Centres Policy, 2009 which states that the Net Community Benefit Test should be used to assess the merits of rezoning in the following circumstances:

·     proposals to develop within an existing centre where the current zoning does not permit the use

·     proposals to develop outside an existing centre where the current zoning does not permit the use

·     proposals to create a new centre.

The main focus of the NCB test is to ensure that centres remain compact and viable and linked to existing and proposed transport networks (particularly public transport).

Assessment against the Net Community Benefit Assessment Criteria is not appropriate for a planning proposal that deals with small scale tourism accommodation issues in a range of zones and circumstances (urban and rural).

The Net Community Benefit Criteria is identified in the NSW Government’s publication Draft Centres Policy, 2009 which states that the Net Community Benefit Test should be used to assess the merits of rezoning in the following circumstances:

·            proposals to develop within an existing centre where the current zoning does not permit the use

·            proposals to develop outside an existing centre where the current zoning does not permit the use

·            proposals to create a new centre.

The main focus of the NCB test is to ensure that centres remain compact and viable and linked to existing and proposed transport networks (particularly public transport).

Assessment against the Net Community Benefit Assessment Criteria is not appropriate for a planning proposal that deals with small scale tourism accommodation issues in a range of zones and circumstances (urban and rural).

 

Section B           Relationship to strategic planning framework

1        Is the planning proposal consistent with the objectives and actions contained within the applicable regional or sub-regional strategy (in this case the Far North Coast Regional Strategy)?

The planning proposal is largely consistent with the outcomes and actions contained within the Far North Coast Regional Strategy (FNCRS).  In particular, the actions related to Economic Development and Employment Growth.  The proposal specifically responds to the following tourism related actions:

·     Local environmental plans will ensure that appropriate land is available to provide for a range of tourism experiences and forms of tourism accommodation.

·     Local environmental plans will permit no more than small scale tourism development in rural or environment protection zones.

By listing Hotel or Motel Accommodation, Backpackers Accommodation and Serviced Apartments as prohibited in the RU1 and RU2 zones, the LEP will limit the scale of tourism development in these zones.

 

2        Is the planning proposal consistent with the local Council’s Community Strategic Plan, or other local strategic plan?

In 2012 Council adopted a 10 year + Community Strategic Plan 2022 (CSP).  The plan is based on five key themes being Corporate Management, Economy, Environment, Community Infrastructure, Society and Culture.  The planning proposal is generally consistent with the following relevant goals:

 

CM4.1 Promote community compliance with Acts, Regulations, Instruments and Council policies and standards

Tourism accommodation in various forms has occurred throughout Byron Shire urban and rural areas. Sometimes with Council approval and sometimes without. The amendments in this planning proposal will “tidy up” some issues and  will allow consent to be obtained in some situations or minor matters to be dealt with as exempt development. This should reduce the level of noncompliance and reduce Council resources absorbed by this issue.Short term letting of dwellings has been widespread throughout Byron Shire urban and rural areas. It has not been subject to the development assessment process and has resulted in compliance issues. Permitting it with consent or as exempt development (if on a small scale with low impacts) will reduce the level of noncompliance and reduce Council resources put into this issue.

EC2.1 Build a tourism industry that delivers local and regional benefits in harmony with the community’s values.

EC2.2 Develop Byron Shire as a leader in responsible and sustainable tourism and encourage sustainable business practices within the tourism industry.

EC2.3 Support and promote a collaborative shire-wide approach to managing tourism.

In the right setting and with good management, bed and breakfast accommodation, serviced apartments and the like can provide rental income for a property owner with minimal impacts on the neighbourhood and infrastructure.

Low key forms of accommodation attract people looking for something other than a “resort’ experience. More of the “holiday spend” from visitors is spread across local businesses, including farmer markets and the like.

Tourism accommodation and management is being viewed on a shire wide basis and not just confined to Byron Bay.In the right setting and with good management short term letting will provide rental income for a property owner with minimal impacts on the neighbourhood and infrastructure.

As a low key form of accommodation it attracts people looking for something other than a “resort’ experience. More of the “holiday spend” from visitors is spread across local businesses, including farmer markets and the like.

Short term holiday letting management is being viewed on a shire wide basis and not just confined to Byron Bay.

On this basis the planning proposal is generally consistent with Council’s CSP.

3        Is the planning proposal consistent with the applicable State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs)?

Most State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPP) are not applicable to this planning proposal.  The State Environmental Planning Policies relevant to the planning proposal are as follows:

 

 

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP)

Compliance of Planning Proposal

SEPP 71 – Coastal Protection

 

Permitting tourist and visitor accommodation (only in part) in RU1 and RU2 zones and serviced apartments in the B4 zone could result in applications in the coastal zone of Byron Shire. The aim of the SEPP and the matters for consideration in clause 8 of the SEPP are matters that Council will consider on a site specific basis in future development applications.  In most cases the development will either be in existing urban areas or relatively small scale. If larger scale development is proposed it will need to be carefully considered. Byron DCP 2014 currently limits rural tourism accommodation to a maximum of 12 bedrooms and 24 guests.  The planning proposal is compliant with the aims of the SEPP.

Permitting short term rental accommodation in zones where dwellings are already permitted could result in applications in the coastal zone of Byron Shire. The aim of the SEPP and the matters for consideration in clause 8 of the SEPP are matters that Council will consider on a site specific basis in future development applications.  In most cases the change of use (if approved) will not result in impacts on the coast beyond that already generated by the existing dwelling. The planning proposal is compliant with the aims of the SEPP.

SEPP 55 – Remediation of land

 

In this case no land is actually being rezoned. The addition of serviced apartments to the B4 zone will not significantly increase the range of sensitive land uses on that land which is already zoned for urban use.   Permitting tourist and visitor accommodation (only in part) in RU1 and RU2 zones will require an applicant to address past land use and possible contamination in any development application. It is consistent with the SEPP.

In this case no land is actually being rezoned and short term rental accommodation will only be permissible where a dwelling is already permitted on the land. This will not significantly increase the range of sensitive land uses on the site and past land use will still be addressed in any development application (if required). It is consistent with the SEPP.

 

4        Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (s117 Directions)?

Consistency with the s117 Directions is assessed in the following table:

 


BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL

                                                                                                                               13.7 - Attachment 1

 

 

 


Consistency with S117(2) Directions

 

S117 Direction

Application

Relevance to this planning proposal

Consistency with direction

1.       Employment and Resources

1.1     Business and Industrial Zones

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within an existing or proposed business or industrial zone (including the alteration of any existing business or industrial zone boundary).

This planning proposal will not affect the boundaries or extent of business or industrial zones. However it will allow shop top housing to be used for short term rental accommodation.  This will not reduce the area available for employment land uses and not alter any locations for business or industry.

Consistent

1.2     Rural Zones

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within an existing or proposed rural zone (including the alteration of any existing rural zone boundary).

Under this direction a planning proposal must:

(a)        not rezone land from a rural zone to a residential, business, industrial, village or tourist zone.

(a)        not contain provisions that will increase the permissible density of land within a rural zone (other than land within an existing town or village).

This planning proposal will apply to rural zoned land where a dwelling is permitted.

It will not alter the zone of any rural land. It will not alter the density of land use within any rural zone.

 

Consistent

1.3     Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that would have the effect of:

(a)        prohibiting the mining of coal or other minerals, production of petroleum, or winning or obtaining of extractive materials, or

(a)        restricting the potential development of resources of coal, other minerals, petroleum or extractive materials which are of State or regional significance by permitting a land use that is likely to be incompatible with such development.

Nothing in this planning proposal will prohibit or restrict exploration or mining.

N/A

1.4     Oyster Aquaculture

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares any planning proposal that proposes a change in land use which could result in:

(a)        adverse impacts on a Priority Oyster Aquaculture Area or a “current oyster aquaculture lease in the national parks estate”, or

(a)        incompatible use of land between oyster aquaculture in a Priority Oyster Aquaculture Area or a “current oyster aquaculture lease in the national parks estate” and other land uses.

Priority Oyster Aquaculture Areas (POAA) exist in the Brunswick River however there is minimal likelihood the planning proposal will have adverse impacts on POAA as the proposed use of the land will be either minor (and therefore exempt development) or subject to an environmental assessment on a case by case basis through the development application process. 

Also most land in the vicinity of the POAA is already zoned for environmental protection or within the national parks estate.

Consistent.

1.5     Rural Lands

Applies when:

(a)        a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within an existing or proposed rural or environment protection zone (including the alteration of any existing rural or environment protection zone boundary), or

(a)        a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that changes the existing minimum lot size on land within a rural or environment protection zone.

A planning proposal to which clauses (a) and (b) apply must be consistent with the Rural Planning Principles listed in State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008.

A planning proposal to which clause (b) applies must be consistent with the Rural Subdivision Principles listed in State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008.

This planning proposal will affect land zoned RU1 or RU2 where a dwelling is permitted.  It will not alter the minimum lot size on any land.

It is consistent with the Rural Planning Principles listed in State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008 as follows:

(a)     the promotion and protection of opportunities for current and potential productive and sustainable economic activities in rural areas – the proposed amendment is not intended to undermine or create conflict with agriculture or other rural land uses.  If a development application is required then the SEE will need to address this issue.

(b)     recognition of the importance of rural lands and agriculture and the changing nature of agriculture and of trends, demands and issues in agriculture in the area, region or State – the use of dwellings for short term rental accommodation is in response to the changing nature of agriculture in Byron Shire including the need for additional income to keep the farm viable.

(c)     recognition of the significance of rural land uses to the State and rural communities, including the social and economic benefits of rural land use and development – Byron Shire has a sustainable agriculture strategy and understands the benefits of maintaining rural land uses.  The proper us of existing dwellings for short term rental will not undermine this.

(d)     in planning for rural lands, to balance the social, economic and environmental interests of the community – the nature of rural land use is changing and the socio-economic interests of the Byron Shire community will be best served by permitting this land use lawfully.  The Byron experience suggests it is widespread and occurs without proper controls. This change to the LEP will permit it to happen openly and to be better controlled.

(e)     the identification and protection of natural resources, having regard to maintaining biodiversity, the protection of native vegetation, the importance of water resources and avoiding constrained land – the LEP amendment will require consideration of the physical environment in which the development will be located (if a development application is required).

(f)      the provision of opportunities for rural lifestyle, settlement and housing that contribute to the social and economic welfare of rural communities – short term rental accommodation is a tourism experience that (if properly managed) can contribute to the economic welfare of rural communities.

(g)     the consideration of impacts on services and infrastructure and appropriate location when providing for rural housing – Council will expect services and infrastructure to be addressed in applications for short term rental accommodation.

(h)     ensuring consistency with any applicable regional strategy of the Department of Planning or any applicable local strategy endorsed by the Director-General – the Far North Coast Regional Strategy applies to Byron Shire and this planning proposal is consistent with it, particularly in relation to providing “for a range of tourism experiences and forms of tourist accommodation…”(page 38).  The LEP changes will limit tourism in rural areas to a small scale.

Consistent.

2        Environment and Heritage

2.1     Environment Protection Zones

A planning proposal must include provisions that facilitate the protection and conservation of environmentally sensitive areas.

A planning proposal that applies to land within an environment protection zone or land otherwise identified for environment protection purposes in a LEP must not reduce the environmental protection standards that apply to the land (including by modifying development standards that apply to the land).  This requirement does not apply to a change to a development standard for minimum lot size for a dwelling in accordance with clause (5) of Direction 1.5 “Rural Lands.

The planning proposal does not alter or remove any environment protection zone.  No environmental standards will be reduced by the proposed LEP changes.

Consistent

2.2     Coastal Protection

Direction applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that applies to land in the coastal zone.

A planning proposal must include provisions that give effect to and are consistent with:

(a)  the NSW Coastal Policy: A Sustainable Future for the New South Wales Coast 1997,

(b)  the Coastal Design Guidelines 2003,

(c)  the manual relating to the management of the coastline for the purposes of section 733 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the NSW Coastline Management Manual 1990).

Certain land affected by this proposal is located within the coastal zone, which affects the eastern half of Byron Shire.

It is consistent with the NSW Coastal Policy as there is minimal likelihood of physical impact on the environment and where a development is not minor it will require an assessment through a development application.  If any land in Byron Shire affected by coastal erosion is proposed for short term rental accommodation then Council will consider the management of the coastline and response to emergencies as part of any application it receives.

Consistent.

2.3     Heritage Conservation

A planning proposal must contain provisions that facilitate the conservation of:

(a)        Items, places, buildings, works, relics, moveable objects or precincts of environmental heritage significance to an area, in relation to the historical, scientific, cultural, social, archaeological, architectural, natural or aesthetic value of the item, area, object or place, identified in a study of the environmental heritage of the area,

(a)        Aboriginal objects or Aboriginal places that are protected under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, and

(a)        Aboriginal areas, Aboriginal objects, Aboriginal places or landscapes identified by an Aboriginal heritage survey prepared by or on behalf of an Aboriginal Land Council, Aboriginal body or public authority and provided to the relevant planning authority, which identifies the area, object, place or landscape as being of heritage significance to Aboriginal culture and people.

Byron LEP 2014 currently contains provisions that are consistent with this Direction. 

N/A

2.4     Recreation Vehicle Areas

A planning proposal must not enable land to be developed for the purpose of a recreation vehicle area (within the meaning of the Recreation Vehicles Act 1983):

(a)        where the land is within an environment protection zone,

(a)        where the land comprises a beach or a dune adjacent to or adjoining a beach,

(a)        where the land is not within an area or zone referred to in paragraphs (4)(a) or (4)(b) unless the relevant planning authority has taken into consideration:

(i)        the provisions of the guidelines entitled Guidelines for Selection, Establishment and Maintenance of Recreation Vehicle Areas, Soil Conservation Service of New South Wales, September 1985, and

(i)        the provisions of the guidelines entitled Recreation Vehicles Act, 1983, Guidelines for Selection, Design, and Operation of Recreation Vehicle Areas, State Pollution Control Commission, September 1985.

The proposal does not enable land to be developed for the purpose of a recreation vehicle area.

N/A

3.       Housing, Infrastructure and Urban Development

3.1     Residential Zones

This direction applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within:

(a)        an existing or proposed residential zone (including the alteration of any existing residential zone boundary),

(a)        any other zone in which significant residential development is permitted or proposed to be permitted.

A planning proposal must include provisions that encourage the provision of housing that will:

(a)        broaden the choice of building types and locations available in the housing market, and

(a)        make more efficient use of existing infrastructure and services, and

(a)        reduce the consumption of land for housing and associated urban development on the urban fringe, and

(a)        be of good design.

A planning proposal must, in relation to land to which this direction applies:

(a)        contain a requirement that residential development is not permitted until land is adequately serviced (or arrangements satisfactory to the council, or other appropriate authority, have been made to service it), and

(a)        not contain provisions which will reduce the permissible residential density of land.

The planning proposal will affect residential zoned land.

The purpose of the LEP amendment is to broaden the potential use of some residential buildings in Byron Shire by permitting short term rental accommodation.

This may lead to a reduction in the availability of housing for permanent occupation in some locations.  

It will not affect the density of residential development.

It will give the choice of using a dwelling for permanent or short term rental accommodation if it meets the criteria in the LEP.

Existing clause 6.6 of Byron LEP 2014 already requires adequate essential services to be available to the land at the time at which consent is granted.

Consistent

3.2     Caravan Parks and Manufactured Home Estates

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal.

In identifying suitable zones, locations and provisions for caravan parks in a planning proposal, the relevant planning authority must:

(a)        retain provisions that permit development for the purposes of a caravan park to be carried out on land, and

(a)        retain the zonings of existing caravan parks, or in the case of a new principal LEP, zone the land in accordance with an appropriate zone under the Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006 that would facilitate the retention of the existing caravan park.

In identifying suitable zones, locations and provisions for manufactured home estates (MHEs) in a planning proposal, the relevant planning authority must:

(a)        take into account the categories of land set out in Schedule 2 of SEPP 36 as to where MHEs should not be located,

(b)  take into account the principles listed in clause 9 of SEPP 36 (which relevant planning authorities are required to consider when assessing and determining the development and subdivision proposals), and

(c)  include provisions that the subdivision of MHEs by long term lease of up to 20 years or under the Community Land Development Act 1989 be permissible with consent.

This proposal does not seek development for the purposes of a caravan park or manufactured homes estate, nor does it impact upon any land that does permit development for the purposes of a caravan park or manufactured homes estate.

N/A

3.3     Home Occupations

Planning proposals must permit home occupations to be carried out in dwelling-houses without the need for development consent.

This proposal does not alter home occupation provisions in Byron LEP 2014.

N/A

3.4     Integrating Land Use and Transport

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will create, alter or remove a zone or a provision relating to urban land, including land zoned for residential, business, industrial, village or tourist purposes.

A planning proposal must locate zones for urban purposes and include provisions that give effect to and are consistent with the aims, objectives and principles of:

(a)        Improving Transport Choice – Guidelines for planning and development (DUAP 2001), and

(a)        The Right Place for Business and Services – Planning Policy (DUAP 2001).

The planning proposal will alter the permitted uses on land zoned for residential (and other purposes) where dwellings are permitted. However, it will not alter zone boundary or create a new zoned area. There is unlikely to be any impact on public transport as a result of this planning proposal.

Consistent.

3.5     Development Near Licensed Aerodrome

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will create, alter or remove a zone or a provision relating to land in the vicinity of a licensed aerodrome.

The main requirements of the Direction are that Council considers the Obstacle Limitation Surface (OLS) as defined by that Department of the Commonwealth for residential purposes, and does not increase residential densities in areas where the ANEF, as from time to time advised by that Department of the Commonwealth, exceeds 25.

The planning proposal will alter provisions that may affect rural zoned land located in the vicinity of the Tyagarah aerodrome.

However, it is about increasing the uses for existing dwellings and will not increase densities or create obstacles in proximity to the aerodrome. Any application in the vicinity of the aerodrome would need to address the issues that relate to this location.

Consistent

4.       Hazard and Risk

4.1     Acid Sulfate Soils

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will apply to land having a probability of containing acid sulfate soils as shown on the Acid Sulfate Soils Planning Maps.

A council shall not prepare a draft LEP that proposes an intensification of land uses on land identified as having a probability of containing acid sulfate soils on the Acid Sulfate Soils Planning Maps unless the council has considered an acid sulfate soils study assessing the appropriateness of the change of land use given the presence of acid sulfate soils.

Some land to which this planning proposal will apply may be affected by acid sulfate soils. The planning proposal will not necessarily lead to intensification of land uses proposed on land identified on the Acid Sulfate Soils Planning Maps.  Council will consider acid sulfate soils if it receives an application in this location in accordance with cl. 6.1 of Byron LEP 2014.

Consistent.

4.2     Mine Subsidence and Unstable Land

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that permits development on land that:

(a)        is within a mine subsidence district, or

(a)        has been identified as unstable in a study, strategy or other assessment undertaken:

(i)        by or on behalf of the relevant planning authority, or

(i)        by or on behalf of a public authority and provided to the relevant planning authority.

This proposal does not impact on any mine subsidence area.

N/A

4.3     Flood Prone Land

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that creates, removes or alters a zone or a provision that affects flood prone land.

A planning proposal must include provisions that give effect to and are consistent with the NSW Flood Prone Land Policy and the principles of the Floodplain Development Manual 2005 (including the Guideline on Development Controls on Low Flood Risk Areas).

A planning proposal must not rezone land within the flood planning areas from Special Use, Special Purpose, Recreation, Rural or Environment Protection Zones to a Residential, Business, Industrial, Special Use or Special Purpose Zone.

A planning proposal must not contain provisions that apply to the flood planning areas which:

(a)        permit development in floodway areas,

(a)        permit development that will result in significant flood impacts to other properties,

(a)        permit a significant increase in the development of that land,

(a)        are likely to result in a substantially increased requirement for government spending on flood mitigation measures, infrastructure or services, or

(a)        permit development to be carried out without development consent except for the purposes of agriculture (not including dams, drainage canals, levees, buildings or structures in floodways or high hazard areas), roads or exempt development.

A planning proposal must not impose flood related development controls above the residential flood planning level for residential development on land, unless a relevant planning authority provides adequate justification for those controls to the satisfaction of the Director-General (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General).

For the purposes of a planning proposal, a relevant planning authority must not determine a flood planning level that is inconsistent with the Floodplain Development Manual 2005 (including the Guideline on Development Controls on Low Flood Risk Areas) unless a relevant planning authority provides adequate justification for the proposed departure from that Manual to the satisfaction of the Director-General (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General).

The planning proposal will not rezone any land.  Byron LEP 2014 already contains a flood planning clause that would apply to short term rental accommodation if it were proposed on land that is flood prone.

Given that attached dwellings are already permitted in the affected zones, the planning proposal will not permit significant development on flood prone land (beyond that already permitted).

The use of dwellings for short term rental accommodation is consistent with the Floodplain Development Manual 2005, and there is unlikely to be a net increase in demand for flood rescue services for sites where it is approved.

Consistent.

4.4     Planning for Bushfire Protection

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect, or is in proximity to land mapped as bushfire prone land.

In the preparation of a planning proposal the relevant planning authority must consult with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service following receipt of a gateway determination under section 56 of the Act, and prior to undertaking community consultation in satisfaction of section 57 of the Act, and take into account any comments so made.

A planning proposal must:

(a)        have regard to Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006,

(a)        introduce controls that avoid placing inappropriate developments in hazardous areas, and

(a)        ensure that bushfire hazard reduction is not prohibited within the APZ.

A planning proposal must, where development is proposed, comply with the following provisions, as appropriate:

(a)        provide an Asset Protection Zone (APZ) incorporating at a minimum:

(i)        an Inner Protection Area bounded by a perimeter road or reserve which circumscribes the hazard side of the land intended for development and has a building line consistent with the incorporation of an APZ, within the property, and

(i)        an Outer Protection Area managed for hazard reduction and located on the bushland side of the perimeter road,

(a)        for infill development (that is development within an already subdivided area), where an appropriate APZ cannot be achieved, provide for an appropriate performance standard, in consultation with the NSW Rural Fire Service.  If the provisions of the planning proposal permit Special Fire Protection Purposes (as defined under section 100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997), the APZ provisions must be complied with,

(a)        contain provisions for two-way access roads which link to perimeter roads and/or to fire trail networks,

(a)        contain provisions for adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes,

(a)        minimise the perimeter of the area of land interfacing the hazard which may be developed,

(a)        introduce controls on the placement of combustible materials in the Inner Protection Area.

Some parts of the land to which this planning proposal applies in Byron Shire may be identified as bushfire prone land.  This will be a consideration in any application for short term rental accommodation.

Early consultation with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service resulted in changes to the exempt development provisions as they relate to short term rental accommodation. The provisions now state that “Prior to commencement a Bushfire Safety Authority under S.100B of the RFS Act 1997 is required on land identified as bush fire prone”.

Where a development application is lodged for short term rental accommodation on land identified as bushfire prone land, the RFS consider it will be Integrated Development under Section 91 of the EPA Act, 1979.

 

Consultation with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service following receipt of a gateway determination under section 56 of the Act will take place when the gateway determination has been received.  It is assumed that any concerns that RFS may still have can be addressed as the planning proposal proceeds.

Consistent.

5.       Regional Planning

5.1          Implementation of Regional Strategies

Planning proposals must be consistent with a regional strategy released by the Minister for Planning.

The planning proposal is largely consistent with the outcomes and actions contained within the Far North Coast Regional Strategy (FNCRS).  In particular, the actions related to Economic Development and Employment Growth.  The proposal specifically responds to the following tourism related actions:

Local environmental plans will ensure that appropriate land is available to provide for a range of tourism experiences and forms of tourism accommodation.

Local environmental plans will permit no more than small scale tourism development in rural or environment protection zones.

Consistent.

5.2     Sydney Drinking Water Catchments

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that applies to the hydrological catchment.

The proposal is not within this catchment.

N/A

5.3     Farmland of State and Regional Significance on the NSW Far North Coast

The planning proposal must not rezone land mapped as State or regionally significant farmland under the Northern Rivers Farmland Protection Project for an urban use.

No land is proposed to be rezoned by this planning proposal. 

N/A

5.4     Commercial and Retail Development along the Pacific Highway, North Coast

A planning proposal that applies to land located on “within town” segments of the Pacific Highway must provide that:

(a)  new commercial or retail development must be concentrated within distinct centres rather than spread along the highway,

(b)  development with frontage to the Pacific Highway must consider the impact the development has on the safety and efficiency of the highway.

(c)  For the purposes of this paragraph, “within town” means areas which, prior to the draft local environmental plan, have an urban zone (eg “village”, “residential”, “tourist”, “commercial”, “industrial”, etc) and where the Pacific Highway speed limit is less than 80 km/hour.

A planning proposal that applies to land located on “out-of-town” segments of the Pacific Highway must provide that:

(a)  new commercial or retail development must not be established near the Pacific Highway if this proximity would be inconsistent with the objectives of this Direction,

(b)  development with frontage to the Pacific Highway must consider the impact the development has on the safety and efficiency of the highway.

(c)  For the purposes of this paragraph, “out-of-town” means areas which, prior to the draft local environmental plan, do not have an urban zone (eg “village”, “residential”, “tourist”, “commercial”, “industrial”, etc) or are in areas where the Pacific Highway speed limit is 80 km/hour or greater.

This planning proposal does not affect commercial or retail uses in proximity to the Pacific Highway.

N/A

6.       Local Plan Making

6.1     Approval and Referral Requirements

A planning proposal must:

(a)        minimise the inclusion of provisions that require the concurrence, consultation or referral of development applications to a Minister or public authority, and

(a)        not contain provisions requiring concurrence, consultation or referral of a Minister or public authority unless the relevant planning authority has obtained the approval of:

(i)        the appropriate Minister or public authority, and

(i)        the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General),

prior to undertaking community consultation in satisfaction of section 57 of the Act, and

(a)        not identify development as designated development unless the relevant planning authority:

(i)        can satisfy the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General) that the class of development is likely to have a significant impact on the environment, and

(i)        has obtained the approval of the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General) prior to undertaking community consultation in satisfaction of section 57 of the Act.

The planning proposal will not include provisions that require the concurrence, consultation or referral of development applications to a Minister or public authority. It does not identify development as designated development.

N/A

6.2     Reserving Land for Public Purposes

A planning proposal must not create, alter or reduce existing zonings or reservations of land for public purposes without the approval of the relevant public authority and the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General).

The planning proposal does not create, alter or reduce land reserved for a public purpose.

N/A

6.3     Site Specific Provisions

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will allow a particular development to be carried out.

A planning proposal that will amend another environmental planning instrument in order to allow a particular development proposal to be carried out must either:

(a)        allow that land use to be carried out in the zone the land is situated on, or

(a)        rezone the site to an existing zone already applying in the environmental planning instrument that allows that land use without imposing any development standards or requirements in addition to those already contained in that zone, or

(a)        allow that land use on the relevant land without imposing any development standards or requirements in addition to those already contained in the principal environmental planning instrument being amended.

A planning proposal must not contain or refer to drawings that show details of the development proposal.

The planning proposal does not seek to allow a particular development to be carried out.

The planning proposal does not contain schematic drawings.

N/A

 

S117 Direction

Application

Relevance to this planning proposal

Consistency with direction

1.      Employment and Resources

1.1    Business and Industrial Zones

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within an existing or proposed business or industrial zone (including the alteration of any existing business or industrial zone boundary).

This planning proposal will not affect the boundaries or extent of business or industrial zones. However it will allow land zoned B4 Mixed Use to be used for serviced apartments.  This will not reduce the area available for employment and will not alter any locations for business or industry.  The B4 zone is confined to two small areas in Byron Bay town centre, an area of vacant land at the northern end of Bayshore Drive in West Byron,  and a strip of Council owned land in Mullumbimby and a section of Tweed Street (Old Pacific Hwy) in Brunswick Heads

The B4 zone in Lismore, Ballina and Tweed LGA’s all permit serviced apartments with consent.

Consistent

1.2    Rural Zones

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within an existing or proposed rural zone (including the alteration of any existing rural zone boundary).

Under this direction a planning proposal must:

(a)         not rezone land from a rural zone to a residential, business, industrial, village or tourist zone.

(b)              not contain provisions that will increase the permissible density of land within a rural zone (other than land within an existing town or village).

 

 

This planning proposal will apply to rural zoned land.

It will not alter the zone of any rural land. It will not alter the density of land use within any rural zone.

 

Consistent

1.3    Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that would have the effect of:

(a)         prohibiting the mining of coal or other minerals, production of petroleum, or winning or obtaining of extractive materials, or

(b)         restricting the potential development of resources of coal, other minerals, petroleum or extractive materials which are of State or regional significance by permitting a land use that is likely to be incompatible with such development.

Nothing in this planning proposal will prohibit or restrict exploration or mining.

N/A

1.4    Oyster Aquaculture

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares any planning proposal that proposes a change in land use which could result in:

(a)         adverse impacts on a Priority Oyster Aquaculture Area or a “current oyster aquaculture lease in the national parks estate”, or

(b)         incompatible use of land between oyster aquaculture in a Priority Oyster Aquaculture Area or a “current oyster aquaculture lease in the national parks estate” and other land uses.

Priority Oyster Aquaculture Areas (POAA) exist in the Brunswick River however there is minimal likelihood the planning proposal will have adverse impacts on POAA as the proposed use of the land will be either minor (and therefore exempt development) or subject to an environmental assessment on a case by case basis through the development application process. 

Also most land in the vicinity of the POAA is already zoned for environmental protection or within the national parks estate.

Consistent.

1.5    Rural Lands

Applies when:

(a)         a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within an existing or proposed rural or environment protection zone (including the alteration of any existing rural or environment protection zone boundary), or

(b)         a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that changes the existing minimum lot size on land within a rural or environment protection zone.

A planning proposal to which clauses (a) and (b) apply must be consistent with the Rural Planning Principles listed in State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008.

A planning proposal to which clause (b) applies must be consistent with the Rural Subdivision Principles listed in State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008.

This planning proposal will affect land zoned RU1 or RU2.  It will not alter the minimum lot size on any land.

Tourist and Visitor Accommodation is permitted with consent in the RU1 and RU2 zones in neighbouring Ballina LEP 2012.  This does not appear to have caused any significant problems.

It is consistent with the Rural Planning Principles listed in State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008 as follows:

(a)     the promotion and protection of opportunities for current and potential productive and sustainable economic activities in rural areas – the proposed amendment is not intended to undermine or create conflict with agriculture or other rural land uses.  Any development application for rural tourist and visitor accommodation will need to address this issue.

(b)     recognition of the importance of rural lands and agriculture and the changing nature of agriculture and of trends, demands and issues in agriculture in the area, region or State – the use of land for rural tourist and visitor accommodation is in response to the changing nature of agriculture in Byron Shire including the need for additional income to keep the farm viable.

(c)     recognition of the significance of rural land uses to the State and rural communities, including the social and economic benefits of rural land use and development – Byron Shire has a sustainable agriculture strategy and understands the benefits of maintaining rural land uses.  Rural tourist and visitor accommodation in appropriate locations should not undermine this recognition.

(d)     in planning for rural lands, to balance the social, economic and environmental interests of the community – the nature of rural land use is changing and the socio-economic interests of the Byron Shire community will be best served by permitting rural tourist and visitor accommodation with Council consent. 

(e)     the identification and protection of natural resources, having regard to maintaining biodiversity, the protection of native vegetation, the importance of water resources and avoiding constrained land – Development applications for rural tourist and visitor accommodation will require consideration of the physical environment in which the development will be located.

(f)      the provision of opportunities for rural lifestyle, settlement and housing that contribute to the social and economic welfare of rural communities – rural tourist and visitor accommodation is a tourism experience that (if properly managed) can contribute to the economic welfare of rural communities.

(g)     the consideration of impacts on services and infrastructure and appropriate location when providing for rural housing – Council will expect services and infrastructure to be addressed in applications for rural tourist and visitor accommodation.

(h)     ensuring consistency with any applicable regional strategy of the Department of Planning or any applicable local strategy endorsed by the Director-General – the Far North Coast Regional Strategy applies to Byron Shire and this planning proposal is consistent with it, particularly in relation to providing “for a range of tourism experiences and forms of tourist accommodation…”(page 38).  Byron DCP 2014 limits tourism in rural areas to a small scale.

Consistent.

2        Environment and Heritage

2.1    Environment Protection Zones

A planning proposal must include provisions that facilitate the protection and conservation of environmentally sensitive areas.

A planning proposal that applies to land within an environment protection zone or land otherwise identified for environment protection purposes in a LEP must not reduce the environmental protection standards that apply to the land (including by modifying development standards that apply to the land).  This requirement does not apply to a change to a development standard for minimum lot size for a dwelling in accordance with clause (5) of Direction 1.5 “Rural Lands.

The planning proposal does not alter or remove any environment protection zone.  No environmental standards will be reduced by the proposed LEP changes.

Consistent

2.2    Coastal Protection

Direction applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that applies to land in the coastal zone.

A planning proposal must include provisions that give effect to and are consistent with:

(a)  the NSW Coastal Policy: A Sustainable Future for the New South Wales Coast 1997,

(b)  the Coastal Design Guidelines 2003,

(c)  the manual relating to the management of the coastline for the purposes of section 733 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the NSW Coastline Management Manual 1990).

Some land affected by this planning proposal is located within the coastal zone, which affects the eastern half of Byron Shire.

It is consistent with the NSW Coastal Policy as there is minimal likelihood of physical impact on the environment and where a development is not minor it will require a development application.  If any land in Byron Shire affected by coastal erosion is proposed for rural tourist and visitor accommodation then Council will consider the management of the coastline and response to emergencies as part of any application it receives.

Consistent.

2.3    Heritage Conservation

A planning proposal must contain provisions that facilitate the conservation of:

(a)         Items, places, buildings, works, relics, moveable objects or precincts of environmental heritage significance to an area, in relation to the historical, scientific, cultural, social, archaeological, architectural, natural or aesthetic value of the item, area, object or place, identified in a study of the environmental heritage of the area,

(b)         Aboriginal objects or Aboriginal places that are protected under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, and

(c)         Aboriginal areas, Aboriginal objects, Aboriginal places or landscapes identified by an Aboriginal heritage survey prepared by or on behalf of an Aboriginal Land Council, Aboriginal body or public authority and provided to the relevant planning authority, which identifies the area, object, place or landscape as being of heritage significance to Aboriginal culture and people.

Byron LEP 2014 currently contains provisions that are consistent with this Direction. 

N/A

2.4    Recreation Vehicle Areas

A planning proposal must not enable land to be developed for the purpose of a recreation vehicle area (within the meaning of the Recreation Vehicles Act 1983):

(a)         where the land is within an environment protection zone,

(b)         where the land comprises a beach or a dune adjacent to or adjoining a beach,

(c)         where the land is not within an area or zone referred to in paragraphs (4)(a) or (4)(b) unless the relevant planning authority has taken into consideration:

(i)    the provisions of the guidelines entitled Guidelines for Selection, Establishment and Maintenance of Recreation Vehicle Areas, Soil Conservation Service of New South Wales, September 1985, and

(ii)    the provisions of the guidelines entitled Recreation Vehicles Act, 1983, Guidelines for Selection, Design, and Operation of Recreation Vehicle Areas, State Pollution Control Commission, September 1985.

The proposal does not enable land to be developed for the purpose of a recreation vehicle area.

N/A

3.       Housing, Infrastructure and Urban Development

3.1    Residential Zones

This direction applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect land within:

(a)         an existing or proposed residential zone (including the alteration of any existing residential zone boundary),

(b)         any other zone in which significant residential development is permitted or proposed to be permitted.

A planning proposal must include provisions that encourage the provision of housing that will:

(a) broaden the choice of building types and locations available in the housing market, and

(b) make more efficient use of existing infrastructure and services, and

(c) reduce the consumption of land for housing and associated urban development on the urban fringe, and

(d) be of good design.

A planning proposal must, in relation to land to which this direction applies:

(a) contain a requirement that residential development is not permitted until land is adequately serviced (or arrangements satisfactory to the council, or other appropriate authority, have been made to service it), and

(b) not contain provisions which will reduce the permissible residential density of land.

The planning proposal will affect residential zoned land.

The purpose of the LEP amendment is to broaden the potential use of some residential buildings in Byron Shire by permitting larger bed and breakfast accommodation (up to 5 bedrooms) in all residential zones with consent and smaller bed and breakfast accommodation (1 bedroom) as exempt development.

This may lead to a reduction in the availability of housing for permanent occupation in some locations. 

It will not affect the density of residential development.

It will give the choice of using a dwelling for permanent or short term rental accommodation if it meets the criteria in the LEP.

Existing clause 6.6 of Byron LEP 2014 already requires adequate essential services to be available to the land at the time at which consent is granted.

Consistent

3.2    Caravan Parks and Manufactured Home Estates

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal.

In identifying suitable zones, locations and provisions for caravan parks in a planning proposal, the relevant planning authority must:

(a) retain provisions that permit development for the purposes of a caravan park to be carried out on land, and

(b) retain the zonings of existing caravan parks, or in the case of a new principal LEP, zone the land in accordance with an appropriate zone under the Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006 that would facilitate the retention of the existing caravan park.

In identifying suitable zones, locations and provisions for manufactured home estates (MHEs) in a planning proposal, the relevant planning authority must:

(a) take into account the categories of land set out in Schedule 2 of SEPP 36 as to where MHEs should not be located,

(b) take into account the principles listed in clause 9 of SEPP 36 (which relevant planning authorities are required to consider when assessing and determining the development and subdivision proposals), and

(c) include provisions that the subdivision of MHEs by long term lease of up to 20 years or under the Community Land Development Act 1989 be permissible with consent.

This proposal does not seek development for the purposes of a caravan park or manufactured homes estate, nor does it impact upon any land that does permit development for the purposes of a caravan park or manufactured homes estate.

N/A

3.3    Home Occupations

Planning proposals must permit home occupations to be carried out in dwelling-houses without the need for development consent.

This proposal does not alter home occupation provisions in Byron LEP 2014.

N/A

3.4    Integrating Land Use and Transport

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will create, alter or remove a zone or a provision relating to urban land, including land zoned for residential, business, industrial, village or tourist purposes.

A planning proposal must locate zones for urban purposes and include provisions that give effect to and are consistent with the aims, objectives and principles of:

(a) Improving Transport Choice – Guidelines for planning and development (DUAP 2001), and

(b) The Right Place for Business and Services – Planning Policy (DUAP 2001).

The planning proposal will alter the permitted uses on land zoned for residential, business, village and tourist purposes. However, it will not alter zone boundaries or create a new zoned area. There is unlikely to be any impact on public transport as a result of this planning proposal.

Consistent.

3.5     Development Near Licensed Aerodrome

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will create, alter or remove a zone or a provision relating to land in the vicinity of a licensed aerodrome.

The main requirements of the Direction are that Council considers the Obstacle Limitation Surface (OLS) as defined by that Department of the Commonwealth for residential purposes, and does not increase residential densities in areas where the ANEF, as from time to time advised by that Department of the Commonwealth, exceeds 25.

The planning proposal will alter provisions that may affect rural zoned land located in the vicinity of the Tyagarah aerodrome.

Any application in the vicinity of the aerodrome would need to address the issues that relate to this location.

Consistent

4.      Hazard and Risk

4.1    Acid Sulfate Soils

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will apply to land having a probability of containing acid sulfate soils as shown on the Acid Sulfate Soils Planning Maps.

A council shall not prepare a draft LEP that proposes an intensification of land uses on land identified as having a probability of containing acid sulfate soils on the Acid Sulfate Soils Planning Maps unless the council has considered an acid sulfate soils study assessing the appropriateness of the change of land use given the presence of acid sulfate soils.

Some land to which this planning proposal will apply may be affected by acid sulfate soils. The planning proposal will not necessarily lead to intensification of land uses proposed on land identified on the Acid Sulfate Soils Planning Maps.  Council will consider acid sulfate soils if it receives an application in this location in accordance with cl. 6.1 of Byron LEP 2014.

Consistent.

4.2    Mine Subsidence and Unstable Land

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that permits development on land that:

(a) is within a mine subsidence district, or

(b) has been identified as unstable in a study, strategy or other assessment undertaken:

(i)    by or on behalf of the relevant planning authority, or

(ii)    by or on behalf of a public authority and provided to the relevant planning authority.

This proposal does not impact on any mine subsidence area.

N/A

4.3    Flood Prone Land

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that creates, removes or alters a zone or a provision that affects flood prone land.

A planning proposal must include provisions that give effect to and are consistent with the NSW Flood Prone Land Policy and the principles of the Floodplain Development Manual 2005 (including the Guideline on Development Controls on Low Flood Risk Areas).

A planning proposal must not rezone land within the flood planning areas from Special Use, Special Purpose, Recreation, Rural or Environment Protection Zones to a Residential, Business, Industrial, Special Use or Special Purpose Zone.

A planning proposal must not contain provisions that apply to the flood planning areas which:

(a)   permit development in floodway areas,

(b)   permit development that will result in significant flood impacts to other properties,

(c)   permit a significant increase in the development of that land,

(d)   are likely to result in a substantially increased requirement for government spending on flood mitigation measures, infrastructure or services, or

(e)   permit development to be carried out without development consent except for the purposes of agriculture (not including dams, drainage canals, levees, buildings or structures in floodways or high hazard areas), roads or exempt development.

A planning proposal must not impose flood related development controls above the residential flood planning level for residential development on land, unless a relevant planning authority provides adequate justification for those controls to the satisfaction of the Director-General (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General).

For the purposes of a planning proposal, a relevant planning authority must not determine a flood planning level that is inconsistent with the Floodplain Development Manual 2005 (including the Guideline on Development Controls on Low Flood Risk Areas) unless a relevant planning authority provides adequate justification for the proposed departure from that Manual to the satisfaction of the Director-General (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General).

The planning proposal will not rezone any land.  It will affect some land that is known to be flood prone. Byron LEP 2014 already contains a flood planning clause (Cl 6.3) and a floodplain risk management clause (Cl 6.4) that would apply to all forms of tourist and visitor accommodation if it were proposed on land that is flood prone.

Within the residential, business and tourist zones, the planning proposal will not permit significant development on flood prone land beyond that already permitted.

The proposed application of tourist and visitor accommodation in various zones is consistent with the Floodplain Development Manual 2005, as applications will be assessed on merit.

There is unlikely to be a net increase in demand for flood rescue services for sites where it is approved.

Consistent.

4.4    Planning for Bushfire Protection

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will affect, or is in proximity to land mapped as bushfire prone land.

In the preparation of a planning proposal the relevant planning authority must consult with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service following receipt of a gateway determination under section 56 of the Act, and prior to undertaking community consultation in satisfaction of section 57 of the Act, and take into account any comments so made.

A planning proposal must:

(a)   have regard to Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006,

(b)   introduce controls that avoid placing inappropriate developments in hazardous areas, and

(c)   ensure that bushfire hazard reduction is not prohibited within the APZ.

A planning proposal must, where development is proposed, comply with the following provisions, as appropriate:

(a)   provide an Asset Protection Zone (APZ) incorporating at a minimum:

(i)    an Inner Protection Area bounded by a perimeter road or reserve which circumscribes the hazard side of the land intended for development and has a building line consistent with the incorporation of an APZ, within the property, and

(ii)    an Outer Protection Area managed for hazard reduction and located on the bushland side of the perimeter road,

(b)   for infill development (that is development within an already subdivided area), where an appropriate APZ cannot be achieved, provide for an appropriate performance standard, in consultation with the NSW Rural Fire Service.  If the provisions of the planning proposal permit Special Fire Protection Purposes (as defined under section 100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997), the APZ provisions must be complied with,

(c)   contain provisions for two-way access roads which link to perimeter roads and/or to fire trail networks,

(d)   contain provisions for adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes,

(e)   minimise the perimeter of the area of land interfacing the hazard which may be developed,

(f)    introduce controls on the placement of combustible materials in the Inner Protection Area.

Some parts of the land to which this planning proposal applies in Byron Shire may be identified as bushfire prone land.  This will be a consideration in any application for tourist and visitor accommodation.

Early consultation with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service resulted in changes to the exempt development provisions as they relate to single bedroom bed and breakfast accommodation. The provisions now state that “Prior to commencement a Bushfire Safety Authority under S.100B of the RFS Act 1997 is required on land identified as bush fire prone”.

Where a development application is lodged for tourist and visitor accommodation on land identified as bushfire prone land, the RFS consider it will be Integrated Development under Section 91 of the EPA Act, 1979.

 

Consultation with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service following receipt of a gateway determination under section 56 of the Act will take place.  It is assumed that any concerns that RFS may still have can be addressed as the planning proposal proceeds.

Consistent.

5.      Regional Planning

5.1          Implementation of Regional Strategies

Planning proposals must be consistent with a regional strategy released by the Minister for Planning.

The planning proposal is largely consistent with the outcomes and actions contained within the Far North Coast Regional Strategy (FNCRS).  In particular, the actions that relate to Economic Development and Employment Growth.  The proposal specifically responds to the following tourism related actions:

Local environmental plans will ensure that appropriate land is available to provide for a range of tourism experiences and forms of tourism accommodation.

Local environmental plans will permit no more than small scale tourism development in rural or environment protection zones.

Council’s DCP 2014 requires that rural tourism accommodation be limited to 12 bedrooms in total and 24 guests.

Consistent.

5.2    Sydney Drinking Water Catchments

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that applies to the hydrological catchment.

The proposal is not within this catchment.

N/A

5.3     Farmland of State and Regional Significance on the NSW Far North Coast

The planning proposal must not rezone land mapped as State or regionally significant farmland under the Northern Rivers Farmland Protection Project for an urban use.

No land is proposed to be rezoned by this planning proposal. 

N/A

5.4     Commercial and Retail Development along the Pacific Highway, North Coast

A planning proposal that applies to land located on “within town” segments of the Pacific Highway must provide that:

(a)         new commercial or retail development must be concentrated within distinct centres rather than spread along the highway,

(b)         development with frontage to the Pacific Highway must consider the impact the development has on the safety and efficiency of the highway.

(c)         For the purposes of this paragraph, “within town” means areas which, prior to the draft local environmental plan, have an urban zone (eg “village”, “residential”, “tourist”, “commercial”, “industrial”, etc) and where the Pacific Highway speed limit is less than 80 km/hour.

A planning proposal that applies to land located on “out-of-town” segments of the Pacific Highway must provide that:

(a)         new commercial or retail development must not be established near the Pacific Highway if this proximity would be inconsistent with the objectives of this Direction,

(b)         development with frontage to the Pacific Highway must consider the impact the development has on the safety and efficiency of the highway.

(c)         For the purposes of this paragraph, “out-of-town” means areas which, prior to the draft local environmental plan, do not have an urban zone (eg “village”, “residential”, “tourist”, “commercial”, “industrial”, etc) or are in areas where the Pacific Highway speed limit is 80 km/hour or greater.

This planning proposal does not affect commercial or retail uses in proximity to the Pacific Highway.

N/A

6.      Local Plan Making

6.1    Approval and Referral Requirements

A planning proposal must:

(a)         minimise the inclusion of provisions that require the concurrence, consultation or referral of development applications to a Minister or public authority, and

(b)         not contain provisions requiring concurrence, consultation or referral of a Minister or public authority unless the relevant planning authority has obtained the approval of:

(i)    the appropriate Minister or public authority, and

(ii)   the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General),

prior to undertaking community consultation in satisfaction of section 57 of the Act, and

(c)         not identify development as designated development unless the relevant planning authority:

(i)    can satisfy the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General) that the class of development is likely to have a significant impact on the environment, and

(ii)   has obtained the approval of the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General) prior to undertaking community consultation in satisfaction of section 57 of the Act.

The planning proposal will not include provisions that require the concurrence, consultation or referral of development applications to a Minister or public authority. It does not identify development as designated development.

N/A

6.2    Reserving Land for Public Purposes

A planning proposal must not create, alter or reduce existing zonings or reservations of land for public purposes without the approval of the relevant public authority and the Director-General of the Department of Planning and Environment (or an officer of the Department nominated by the Director-General).

The planning proposal does not create, alter or reduce land reserved for a public purpose.

N/A

6.3    Site Specific Provisions

Applies when a relevant planning authority prepares a planning proposal that will allow a particular development to be carried out.

A planning proposal that will amend another environmental planning instrument in order to allow a particular development proposal to be carried out must either:

(a) allow that land use to be carried out in the zone the land is situated on, or

(b) rezone the site to an existing zone already applying in the environmental planning instrument that allows that land use without imposing any development standards or requirements in addition to those already contained in that zone, or

(c) allow that land use on the relevant land without imposing any development standards or requirements in addition to those already contained in the principal environmental planning instrument being amended.

A planning proposal must not contain or refer to drawings that show details of the development proposal.

The planning proposal does not seek to allow a particular development to be carried out.

The planning proposal does not contain schematic drawings.

N/A


BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL

                                                                                                                               13.7 - Attachment 1

 


Section C          Environmental, social and economic impact

1        Is there any likelihood that critical habitat or threatened species, populations or ecological communities, or their habitats will be adversely affected as a result of the proposal?

No.  Although Byron Shire is a biodiversity hot spot with large numbers of threatened species and endangered ecological communities, this planning proposal should not directly affect these if future applications are assessed properly. In many cases (eg serviced apartments and bed and breakfast accommodation) in existing urban areas there will be little likelihood of adverse effects. Where a development application is required then Council can (if appropriate) require a thorough ecological assessment to accompany any application consistent with its “Guidelines for Ecological Assessment in Byron Shire”.

No.  Although Byron Shire is a biodiversity hot spot with large numbers of threatened species and endangered ecological communities, this planning proposal should not directly affect these if it is implemented properly.  A dwelling would normally exist on the subject land.  If the proposed activity is minor it will be exempt development. If a Development application is required then Council can (if appropriate) require a thorough ecological assessment to accompany any application consistent with its “Guidelines for Ecological Assessment in Byron Shire”.

2        Are there any other likely environmental effects as a result of the planning proposal and how are they proposed to be managed?

Environmental impacts will be minimal for development in existing urban zones. Environmental effects in rural zones (such as managing on-site effluent disposal) will be addressed at the development assessment stage.

Environmental impacts, such as managing on-site effluent disposal in a rural setting, can be addressed at the development assessment stage.

3        How has the planning proposal adequately addressed any social and economic effects?

The planning proposal may result in an impact on neighbourhood character over time.  This will depend on the extent of take up of development such as serviced apartments or bed and breakfast accommodation. It will also depend on the style and location of new buildings.  Council will need to consider this in any DA. The planning proposal will increase the options for tourist and visitor accommodation in some zones. In rural areas roads and neighbouring land uses will be key considerations. However, the planning proposal does have the potential to provide increased financial support for residents of Byron Shire particularly at peak tourism times. 

The planning proposal may result in an impact on neighbourhood character over time.  This will depend on the extent of take up of short term rental accommodation and the style and location of structures.  Council will need to consider this in any DA. The planning proposal will allow dwellings to be used for tourist accommodation as well as normal residential use. This has the potential to provide increased financial support for residents of Byron Shire particularly at peak tourism times.  

 

Section D                     State and Commonwealth interests

1        Is there adequate public infrastructure for the planning proposal?

In existing urban areas it is likely there will be adequate water and sewerage services as well as roads, power and communications. In rural areas the ability to provide infrastructure will be a key consideration in any development application. Section 94 contributions may be applicable to development applications for tourist and visitor accommodation but this will need to be considered against the contributions previously paid for any site and will be a future decision for Council. 

The additional use is based on existing dwellings which typically would be adequately served by water and sewerage or on-site sewage management.  Power and telephone will usually be linked to the existing dwelling (if not also self-sufficient, eg solar or mobile phone).  Section 94 contributions may be applicable to development applications for short term rental accommodation but this will need to be considered against the contributions previously paid for any site and will be a future decision for Council. 

2        What are the views of State and Commonwealth public authorities consulted in accordance with the gateway determination?

Commonwealth public authorities have not been formally involved in this particular planning proposal as it is yet to receive Gateway Approval.  At this early stage it appears unlikely that there will be any issues of interest to Commonwealth authorities.

A Discussion Paper was circulated locally and then a Draft Short Term Holiday Accommodation Strategy was circulated more widely in late 2014. The Rural Fire Service made a submission as did the Department of Planning and Environment. The proposed exempt provisions have been amended to align with the RFS views on bushfire prone land. The Department’s views have been considered and also influence the proposed LEP clauses.

 

Commonwealth public authorities have not been formally involved in this particular planning proposal as it is yet to receive Gateway Approval.  At this early stage it appears unlikely that there will be any issues of interest to Commonwealth authorities.

A Discussion Paper was circulated locally and then a Draft Short Term Holiday Accommodation Strategy was circulated more widely in late 2014. The Rural Fire Service made a submission as did the Department of Planning and Environment. The proposed exempt provisions have been amended to align with the RFS views on bushfire prone land. The Department’s views have been considered and also influence the proposed LEP clauses.[M1] 

The following table provides a summary of the relevant public authorities, which in the opinion of Council, should be consulted in accordance with the Gateway Determination:

 

Public authority/stakeholder

Issue requiring comment

NSW Rural Fire Service

Section 117 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Ministerial Direction 4.4 to consult with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service.Section 117 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Ministerial Direction 4.4 to consult with the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service.

 


 

Part 4   Mapping

The planning proposal does not involve any map amendments.

Part 5   Community consultation

Council will commence community consultation in accordance with the Gateway Determination.  For the purposes of public notification, the planning proposal is not considered to be low impact as outlined in the Department of Planning and Infrastructure’s, A guide to preparing local environmental plans, and a 28 day public exhibition period is recommended.

Notification of the exhibited planning proposal will include:

·     a newspaper advertisement that circulates in the Byron LGA, which is the area affected by the planning proposal

·     the website of Byron Shire Council and the Department of Planning and Environment.

Part 6   Project timeline

The proposed timeline for the completion of the planning proposal is as follows:

Estimated completion

Plan making step

July August 2015

Gateway determination issued by Department of Planning and Environment.

August / September 2015

Public exhibition of planning proposal.

Government agency consultation.

September / October 2015

Analysis of public submissions.

Preparation of Council report.

October November 2015

Public submissions report to Council.

November  December 2015

Endorsed planning proposal submitted to Department of Planning and Environment for finalisation or dealt with by Council under delegation.

 

Summary and conclusions

Byron Shire Council has initiated a planning proposal to modify its 2014 LEP to amend the land use tables for the B4 Mixed Use, RU1 Primary Production and RU2 Rural Landscape zones in relation to serviced apartments and tourist and visitor accommodation and make minor clause amendments relating to bed and breakfast accommodation.  The amendments to bed and breakfast accommodation will also affect land in the RU1 Primary Production, RU2 Rural Landscape, RU5 Village, R2 Low Density Residential, R3 Medium Density Residential, R5 Large Lot Residential, B2 Local Centre, B4 Mixed Use, and SP3 Tourist zones.

The preferred method to achieve this will be to amend the land use tables, amend
Cl 5.4 (1) and amend the exempt provisions in Schedule 2. 

The planning proposal is consistent with the Far North Coast Regional Strategy and SEPPs.  It is also consistent with the relevant section 117 Directions.

It is not considered that this planning proposal raises any issues that require further studies or detailed assessment.

Byron Shire Council has initiated a planning proposal to modify its 2014 LEP to permit short term rental accommodation either with consent or as exempt development.

The preferred method to achieve this will be to add a new local provision (clause 6.10) and to amend the exempt provisions in Schedule 2. 

The planning proposal is consistent with the Far North Coast Regional Strategy and SEPPs.  It is also consistent with section 117 Directions.

It is not considered that this planning proposal raises any issues that require further studies or detailed assessment.

 


BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL

                                                                                                                               13.7 - Attachment 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix 1

Short Term Rental Accommodation Action Plan

(BSC #E2015/28038)

 

 

 

 


 

 

Appendix 2 - Holiday Letting Strategy Discussion Paper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Appendix 3 - Draft Short Term Holiday Accommodation Strategy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 [M1]Chris, I don’t attach the submissions here because in my opinion they are submissions on the earlier stage. You may disagree. Happy to discuss.