Ordinary Meeting
Minutes
21 June 2018
MINUTES OF THE BYRON
SHIRE COUNCIL Ordinary Meeting HELD
ON Thursday, 21 June 2018
COMMENCING AT 9.04AM
AND CONCLUDING AT 4.18PM
I2018/1146
PRESENT: Cr
S Richardson (Mayor), Cr B Cameron, Cr C Coorey, Cr J Hackett, Cr A Hunter,
Cr M Lyon, Cr J Martin, Cr S Ndiaye and Cr P Spooner
Staff: Mark
Arnold (Acting General Manager)
James
Brickley (Acting Director Corporate and Community Services)
Phil
Holloway (Director Infrastructure Services)
Shannon
Burt (Director Sustainable Environment and Economy)
Anna
Vinfield (Manager Corporate Services)
Mila
Jones (Minute Taker)
The Mayor opened the meeting and acknowledged that
the meeting is being held on Arakwal Country and that we pay our respects to
the elders past and present and extend our respect to the Bundjalung clans
whose lands and waters are part of the Shire.
Public
Access
Prior to dealing with the circulated reports and associated
information, a Public Access Session was held and Council was addressed on the
following:
8.2 General
Manager Recruitment
John Anderson addressed Council against the confidentiality.
9.3 Lots
Identified
Sara Gloede addressed Council in favour of the
recommendation.
13.1 Proposed
Amendments to Council's Code of Meeting Practice
Matthew O’Reilly (CABS) and John Anderson addressed
Council against the recommendation.
13.9 CZMP
for the Eastern Precincts of the Byron Bay Embayment (Cape Byron to Main Beach)
- Engagement and Public Exhibition Outcome
Michael Worrall (Wategos Beach Protection Association) addressed
Council in favour of the recommendation.
13.11 CZMP
for the Eastern Precincts of the Byron Bay Embayment (Cape Byron to Main Beach)
- Engagement and Public Exhibition Outcome
Jane Magnus (Byron Events Industry Association) addressed
Council in favour of the recommendation.
Matthew O’Reilly (CABS) and Peter Gibson addressed
Council against the recommendation.
13.13 Residential
Strategy - Accessible Housing Project (Housing Summit Action)
Matthew O’Reilly (CABS) addressed Council in favour
of the recommendation.
13.14 Barrio
Eatery and Bar - Update on Resolution 18-170
David Dixon (Bayshore Apartments owners Corporation)
addressed Council in favour of the recommendation.
13.25 Development
of a Dogs in Public Spaces Strategy
Angela Dunlop addressed Council in favour of the
recommendation.
13.27 Biobanking
for Byron Bay Bypass - Dedication Of Land
John Anderson addressed Council against the
recommendation.
16.3 CONFIDENTIAL
- 2017-0050 EOI: Redevelopment of 1 Broken Head Road, Byron Bay
John Stewart and Harley Graham addressed Council in
favour of the recommendation.
Mary Gardner and Liz Levy addressed Council against the
recommendation.
Submission
No. 1 Surf School Licencing
Nathan Folks (Mojosurf) made a submission to Council
regarding the surf school licencing process in Byron Shire.
Submission
No. 2 Positive Feedback
Matthew O’Reilly (CABS) made a submission to Council commending
the work of the Acting General Manager.
Question
No. 1 Development related information on Council’s
website
Matthew O’Reilly (CABS) asked the following question:
Byron Council has updated it’s website, but the new
website has less development related information than the old website. The
eServices interface used to allow community members to access conditions of
consent for development approvals, construction certificate details, and
complying development certificate details; but now this information is
completely unavailable. Likewise, just over a year ago the eService interface
used to allow searches of Development Applications by development type, this
function has since been removed. If Council is trying to improve its
communication and build trust with the community, why have these important
transparency measures been removed?
The Director Sustainable Environment and Economy noted
that there has been feedback given to her Directorate with regard to the
website. Her staff, along with the communications team have been proactively
working to address these issues. We should have, within this week, some new
webpage functionality and some new functionality introduced on our DA tracking
system including new links and some new fact sheets. She advised she was more
than happy to have another conversation with Mr O’Reilly at another time
about whether or not that’s working.
Question No. 2 Byron Bay Bypass – Butler Street
Residents
John Anderson asked Council the following question:
Late last year Council’s lawyers demanded the personal
financial details of many members of the Butler Street residents group opposed
to the bypass, leading to complaints to Council about intimidation. You Mr
Mayor, were quoted in the press as saying you would “look into it”
or something to that effect. What were the results of your enquiries as
to who authorised that legal action and why?
The question was taken on notice.
Note: Questions provided but not tabled in person at the
meeting will be included in the next available Ordinary Meeting Agenda as a
Question with Notice.
The meeting adjourned at 10.32am and reconvened at 11.00am.
Apologies
There were no apologies.
Requests
for Leave of Absence
There
were no requests for leave of absence
Declarations
of Interest – Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary
The Acting General Manager, Mark Arnold, declared a
pecuniary interest in Item 8.2. The nature of the interest being that is an
applicant for the position. Mr Arnold elected to leave the Chamber during the
discussion and vote on the item.
Cr Spooner declared a pecuniary interest in Report 13.3. The
nature of the interest being that his employer, Byron Bay Community Association
is the license holder for the Artisan Market. Cr Spooner elected to leave
the Chamber and will not participate in discussion and the vote.
Cr Spooner declared a non-pecuniary interest in Report
13.18. The nature of the interest being that he manages Byron Community Centre
that utilises the park for numerous events. Cr Spooner elected to stay in the
Chamber, will participate in the discussion and the vote.
Tabling of Pecuniary Interest
Returns
There were no Pecuniary Interest Returns tabled.
Adoption
of Minutes from Previous Meetings
18-347
|
Resolved:
1. That
the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held 24 May 2018 be confirmed with Part 1
of Resolution 18-298 being amended to read:
‘Forward the revised
planning proposal (Attachment 3) to the NSW Department of Planning and
Environment to advise of the re-exhibition’.
2. That
the minutes of the Byron Shire Reserve Trust Committee meeting held 24 May
2018 be confirmed. (Hunter/Spooner)
The motion
was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Reservation
of Items for Debate and Order of Business
The Mayor suspended standing
orders to allow for items to be reserved for debate, being:
Staff Reports
Corporate and Community Services
Report No. 13.1 Proposed
Amendments to Council's Code of Meeting Practice
Report
No. 13.4 Mayor and Councillor Fees
2018/2019
Report
No. 13.7 LGNSW Board Vacancy - Vice
President (Rural/Regional Councils)
Sustainable Environment and Economy
Report No. 13.9 CZMP
for the Eastern Precincts of the Byron Bay Embayment (Cape Byron to Main Beach)
- Engagement and Public Exhibition Outcome
Report No. 13.11 PLANNING
- 26.2016.4.1 - Rural Function Centres - Results of Community Engagement
Report No. 13.12 Adoption of
Constitution for Strategic Business Panel
Report No. 13.13 PLANNING -
Residential Strategy - Accessible Housing Project (Housing Summit Action)
Report No. 13.14 Barrio Eatery
and Bar - Update on Resolution 18-170
Report No. 13.18 PLANNING -
Status report - Resolution 17-575 - Plan of Management for Railway Park
Report
No. 13.21 PLANNING - Development Application
10.2018.110.1 Tourist and Visitor Accommodation (Twelve (12) Cabins including
Use of Existing Structures as Storage and Staff Lunchroom and Construction of
Day Spa), Camping Ground (Two Hundred and Thirty Nine (239) Sites), Park Entry
Office/Kiosk, New Dwelling and Recreation Facility (Indoors) - Yoga Facility at
1897 Coolamon Scenic Drive Mullumbimby
Report No. 13.23 Actions
from Agriculture and Farm Consultation
Infrastructure Services
Report No. 13.27 Biobanking for
Byron Bay Bypass - Dedication Of Land
Report No. 13.28 Update on MR
545 Transport Studies
Confidential Reports
Infrastructure Services
Report No. 16.3 Confidential - 2017-0050 EOI:
Redevelopment of 1 Broken Head Road, Byron Bay
The remaining Recommendations
and Committee Recommendation were adopted as a whole, being moved by Cr
Richardson and seconded by Cr Cameron. Each recommendation is recorded with a
separate resolution number commencing at Resolution No. 18-348 and concluding
with Resolution No. 18-395.
Note: The vote on this item was recommitted at Resolution
No. 18-397 in order for Cr Spooner to leave the Chamber in accordance with his
earlier declared pecuniary interest in Report 13.3.
submissions and grants
|
Report No. 11.1 Byron
Shire Council Submissions and Grants as at 30 May 2018
File No: I2018/1029
|
18-348
|
Resolved that Council
note the report and attachment (#E2018/45500) for the Byron Shire Council
Submissions and Grants as at 30 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
Staff Reports - Corporate and
Community Services
|
Report No. 13.2 Mayor
and Councillors Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy Review
File No: I2017/1012
|
18-349
|
Resolved:
1. That
in accordance with Section 253 of the Local Government Act 1993, Council
adopt the amended Councillor Expenses and Facilities Policy as shown at
Attachment 3 (E2018/47331) to be placed on public exhibition for a minimum
period of 28 days.
2. That
in the event:
a) that
any submissions are received on the draft Policy, that those submissions be
reported back to Council, prior to the adoption of the Policy.
OR
b) that
no submissions are received on the draft Policy, that the Policy be adopted
and incorporated into Council’s Policy Register. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.3 Temporary
suspension of Railway Park artisan markets
File No: I2018/684
Cr Spooner
left the Chamber in accordance with his earlier declared pecuniary interest
in this matter.
|
18-350
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council suspend artisan markets at Railway Park, without payment of rent,
during the Railway Park upgrade construction period.
2. That
Council consider an expanded market licence area following the upgrade to
Railway Park to offset the loss of income to the BBCA during the construction
period.
3. That
Council approve outside of the Railway Park upgrade schedule, the proposal by
the Byron Bay Community Association Inc to:
a) permit
suspension of artisan markets at Railway Park, without payment of rent,
during cooler months commencing from the first Saturday in May and completing
on the last Saturday in September for each remaining year of the licence; and
b) request
a variation of the proposed 5 month suspension by the BBCA, should the
BBCA decide to re-start artisan markets at Railway Park before the last
Saturday in September but after the first Saturday in May for each remaining
year of the licence; and
c)
to permit non-payment of rent upon cancellation of an artisan market in
Railway Park by the BBCA during the months October to April of each remaining
year of the licence, where the cancellation is a result of works or an event
outside the control of the BBCA (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.5 Community
Initiatives Program (Section 356) - 2017/18 funding round applications
File No: I2018/944
|
18-351
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council provide $5,000 from the unallocated Section 356 budget to each of the
projects which met the assessment criteria of the Community Initiatives
Program 2017/18 funding round and which are recommended for funding in
Confidential Attachment 1 (#E2018/48170).
2. That
Council advertise the Section 356 Donations proposed to be made in part 1 if
approved by Council.
3. That
the 2018/19 funding round of the Community Initiatives Program be advertised
as soon as practicable following adoption of the 2018/2019 Budget.
4. That
Council note that unsuccessful applicants from this funding round will be
provided detailed feedback and staff support to work on more complete
applications that meet all criteria in future rounds.
5. That
Council staff will continue to work with community groups to support them in
submitting high quality applications to future rounds of the program. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.6 Public
Hearing into Byron Bay Police Actions - outcome
File No: I2018/1034
|
18-352
|
Resolved that Council
note the Public Hearing into Byron Bay Police Actions report.
(Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.8 Investments
May 2018
File No: I2018/1041
|
18-353
|
Resolved that the
report listing Council’s investments and overall cash position as at 31
May 2018 be noted. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
Staff Reports - Sustainable
Environment and Economy
|
Report No. 13.10 PLANNING
- Draft Employment Lands Strategy for Public Exhibition
File No: I2018/920
|
18-354
|
Resolved that Council place the draft Employment Land
Strategy, Attachment 1 (#E2018/47136) on public exhibition for a period of 6 weeks and
that the exhibition of the Strategy is accompanied by the Employment Land
Strategy Background Report, Attachment 2 (#E2018/47137). (Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put
to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey,
Martin, Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett, Spooner and Hunter voted
in favour of the motion.
No Councillors
voted against the motion.
|
|
Report No. 13.15 Report
of the Planning Review Committee Meeting held on 15 May 2018
File No: I2018/941
|
18-355
|
Resolved that Council note the report of the Planning Review
Committee meeting held on 15 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.16 Local
Development Performance Monitoring and DPE Development Assessment Best
Practice Guide
File No: I2018/961
|
18-356
|
Resolved that Council
receive and note the report. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.17 PLANNING
- Residential Strategy - Update on responses to relevant state government
policy
File No: I2018/966
|
18-357
|
Resolved that Council:
1. Formally
write to the Department of Planning and Environment to confirm they are
considering expanding the areas that SEPP 70 applies and if Council’s
detailed submission for inclusion in SEPP 70 is warranted at this time.
2. Note that staff have written to the Department of
Planning (as requested) to seek a pause on the application of the
Low Rise Medium Density Housing Code to
Byron Shire until the Residential Strategy is finalised. (Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey, Martin, Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett
and Hunter voted in favour of the motion.
No Crs voted against the motion.
|
|
Report No. 13.19 PLANNING
- NSW Planning System Reforms and Community Engagement Obligations for
Planning Functions
File No: I2018/1035
|
18-358
|
Resolved that Council:
1. Note
that further information will be provided to Councillors to assist with the
development of a template for ‘statement of reasons’ for
decisions following the release of guidelines from the Department of Planning
& Environment.
2. Support
the commencement of a review of the existing Byron DCP 2010 & 2014
requirements for public exhibition and notification of development
applications by staff as part of the preparation of community participation
plan; and receive a further report on this prior to or at the December 2018
meeting of Council.
3. In
response to current community concerns about major development notification
have staff:
a) Prepare
a draft amendment to Byron DCP 2010 & 2014 requiring developers to consult
with members of the community who are affected by proposed ‘major
development’ before any development application is made to Council, and
exhibit this draft amendment.
b) Prepare
a draft amendment to Byron DCP 2010 & 2014 requiring site notification
for development applications subject to Level 2 notification, and exhibit
this draft amendment.
4. Receive
a further report on a) and b) above only if submissions are received to the
amendments proposed; otherwise upon completion of the notification period
approve the amendments to the Development Control Plans as exhibited. (Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey, Martin, Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett
and Hunter voted in favour of the motion.
No Crs voted against the motion.
Cr Spooner was not present for the vote.
|
|
Report No. 13.20 PLANNING
- Exceptions to Development Standards - 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2018
File No: I2018/1048
|
18-359
|
Resolved that Council note the report on exceptions to
development standards for the period 1 January to 31 March 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey, Martin, Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett
and Hunter voted in favour of the motion.
No Crs voted against the motion.
|
|
Report No. 13.22 PLANNING
- Development Application 10.2018.25.1 Subdivision two lots into three
lots at 31 Blackwood Crescent and Ballina Road Bangalow
File No: I2018/1058
|
18-360
|
Resolved that pursuant to Section 80 of the Environmental Planning
& Assessment Act 1979, development application 10.2018.25.1 for
Subdivision of two (2) lots into three (3) lots, be granted consent subject to
conditions in Attachment 3 #E2018/47431. (Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey, Martin, Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett
and Hunter voted in favour of the motion.
No Crs voted against the motion.
|
|
Report No. 13.24 Byron
Visitor Centre
File No: I2018/1067
|
18-361
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council undertake a consultation process with the Local Area Commander of
Police to recommend that Lot 1 DP 827049 being the site of the Byron Visitor
Centre be declared an Alcohol Prohibited Area (at all times).
2. That
if no submissions are received from the Local Area Commander of Police during
the consultation process, Council declare the Byron Visitor Centre lease site
an Alcohol Prohibited Area (at all times).
3. That
if declared an Alcohol Prohibited Area, Council install three (3) Alcohol
Prohibited Area signs within the Byron Visitor Centre leased site.
4. That
Council’s Busking Policy 13/002 be amended to include the Byron
Visitors Centre leased site as a designated busking area.
5. That
the amended Busking Policy 13/002 be placed on public exhibition for a period
of 28 days, and that if no submissions are received the Policy be adopted. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.25 Development
of a Dogs in Public Spaces Strategy
File No: I2018/1071
|
18-362
|
Resolved that Council:
1. Note
the report and support the preparation of a Byron Shire Dogs in Public Spaces
Strategy.
2. Receive
a further report on Stage 1 - Byron Shire Dogs in Public Spaces Strategy
(Initial information gathering and research) and a Community Engagement Plan
once this work is completed. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 13.26 BSC
ats Dromore Properties Pty Ltd Land and Environment Court Proceedings
File No: I2018/1059
|
18-363
|
Resolved that the General
Manager be authorised to enter into consent orders or a s34 Conciliation
Agreement approving Development Application 10.2017.686.1, subject to
appropriate conditions to be finalised under delegation.
(Richardson/Cameron)
|
committee
Reports - Corporate and Community Services
|
Report No. 14.1 Report
of the Finance Advisory Committee Meeting held on 17 May 2018
File No: I2018/939
|
18-364
|
Resolved that Council note the notes of the Finance Advisory
Committee Meeting held on 17 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-365
|
Resolved that
Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report No. 4.1 2017/18 Financial
Sustainability Plan - Update on the Action Implementation Plan as at 31 March
2018
File No:
I2018/453
Committee Recommendation 4.1.1
That the
update report to 31 March 2018 on the 2017/2018 Financial Sustainability Plan
Action Implementation Plan (E2018/19525) be received and noted. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-366
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report
No. 4.2 Budget Review - 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2018
File No:
I2018/868
Committee Recommendation 4.2.1
That Council note :
1. That
Council authorised the itemised budget variations as shown in Attachment 2
(#E2018/39650) which included the following results in the 31 March 2018
Quarterly Review of the 2017/2018 Budget:
a) General
Fund – $256,900 increase to the Estimated Unrestricted Cash Result
b) General
Fund - $1,734,800 increase in reserves
c) Water
Fund - $1,195,100 increase in reserves
d) Sewerage
Fund - $2,930,600 increase in reserves
2. That
Council adopted the revised General Fund Estimated Unrestricted Cash Result
of $1,145,200 for the 2017/2018 financial year as at 31 March 2018.
At its
Ordinary meeting held on 24 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-367
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report No. 4.3 Quarterly Update -
Implementation of Special Rate Variation
File No:
I2018/869
Committee Recommendation 4.3.1
That the Finance Advisory
Committee note the quarterly update on the Special Rate Variation
Implementation as at 31 March 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-368
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report
No. 4.4 Funding Options for Railway Square Stage 2
File No: I2018/277
Committee
Recommendation 4.4.1
That the Finance Advisory Committee
recommend to Council that the funding model and budget estimate for the
delivery of Railway Square, Stage 2 as set out in Option 3 of this report be
adopted. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 14.2 Report
of the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Meeting held on 17 May 2018
File No: I2018/1043
|
18-369
|
Resolved that Council note the minutes of the Audit, Risk
and Improvement Committee Meeting held on 17 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-370
|
Resolved that Council adopt
the following Committee Recommendation:
Report No. 4.1 Local Government
Performance Excellence Program - Byron Shire Council 2017 Performance Results
File No: I2018/655
Committee
Recommendation 4.1.1
That the Internal Audit, Risk
and Improvement Committee note the Byron Shire Council LG Performance
Excellence Program FY17 Report and that future reports be presented to the
Committee. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-371
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 4.2 NSW Audit Office - Local Government 2017 Financial
Audit Report
File No: I2018/866
Committee
Recommendation 4.2.1
That the Audit, Risk and
Improvement Committee note the contents and recommendations made in the Local
Government 2017 Financial Audit from the NSW Audit Office at Attachment 1
(#E2018/35811). (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-372
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 4.3 Internal Activity & Progress Report - May 2018
File No: I2018/862
Committee Recommendation 4.3.1
1. That
the Audit, Risk and Improvement Advisory Committee note the Internal Audit
Activity Report – May 2018 (#E2018/39734).
2. That
the Audit, Risk and Improvement Advisory Committee endorse the recommendation
to vary the audit program and replace the planned IT User Access Review in
Quarter 4 of 2017/2018 year with an audit review of Council’s current
systems and processes to ensure/test compliance with Council’s six
Environment Protection Licences in the Sewerage, Landfill and Quarry operations.
3. That
the IT User Access review be completed no later than Quarter 2 of 2018/2019
financial year. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-373
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 5.1 2017/2018 External Audit Client Service Plan
File No: I2018/810
Committee
Recommendation 5.1.1
1. That
Council note the External Audit Client Service Plan prepared by the Audit
Office of New South Wales for the year ended 30 June 2018 as outlined in Attachment
1 (#E2018/36320).
2. That
the report and Attachment 1 of the closed part of the meeting remain
confidential.
(Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-374
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 5.2 Risk Management Framework & Business Continuity
Update
File No: I2018/683
Committee
Recommendation 5.2.1
That the Internal Audit, Risk
and Improvement Committee note ongoing work undertaken in improving
Council’s risk management approach and business continuity and disaster
recovery efforts across the organisation. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-375
|
Resolved:
that Council
adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report No. 5.3 Fraud and Corruption
Control Audit Review Report
File No:
I2018/654
Committee Recommendation 5.3.1
1. That
the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee note the Fraud and Corruption
Controls internal audit review report.
2. That
the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee request that management implement
the recommendations made in the report identified as Attachment 1
(#E2018/39530), subject to the revaluation of the rating of detailed finding
2.3 – Fraud and Corruption Policy/Framework from Medium to High.
3. That
the report and Attachment 1 of the closed part of the meeting remain
confidential.
4. That
an update on fraud and corruption controls be presented at future meetings.
(Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 14.3 Report
of the Arakwal Memorandum of Understanding Advisory Committee Meeting held on
31 May 2018
File No: I2018/1078
|
18-376
|
Resolved that Council note the minutes of the Arakwal
Memorandum of Understanding Advisory Committee Meeting held on 31 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-377
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report No. 4.1 Aboriginal
Services Coalition
File No:
I2018/821
Committee Recommendation 4.1.1
That the Arakwal Memorandum of
Understanding Advisory Committee note the progress of this project and the
priorities for 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-378
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report No. 4.2 Byron Shire Pest
Management Plan - Consultation
File No:
I2018/822
Committee Recommendation 4.2.1
1. That
the Arakwal Memorandum of Understanding Advisory Committee provide feedback
on the attached draft Cultural Impact (#E2018/44646). The feedback is as
follows:
· Change the
name of the Plan to include the word “Animal” in the title
2. That
feedback on the Plan be sought from the Arakwal Corporation, and received by
mid June 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-379
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report
No. 4.3 Illegal Campers at Ironbark Avenue and Vegetation
on Council Land
File No: I2018/823
Committee
Recommendation 4.3.1
That the Arakwal Memorandum of
Understanding Advisory Committee recommend that Council staff conduct a site
meeting with Council Engineers (drainage issues) and Arakwal representatives,
including discussion on signage, as a matter of priority. The Committee noted
there is an allocation in the draft 2018/19 budget for the works. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-380
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report
No. 4.4 Byron Town Centre Masterplan - Ongoing Consultation
with Arakwal
File No: I2018/824
Committee
Recommendation 4.4.1
1. That
the Arakwal Memorandum of Understanding Advisory Committee establish Byron
Bay Town Centre Masterplan as a Standing Item on the agenda until the project
is implemented.
2. That
Claire McGarry attend an Arakwal Corporation Board meeting, on a date to be
determined, to discuss the Masterplan. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-381
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation:
Report
No. 4.5 Master Plan Mullumbimby
File No: I2018/882
Committee
Recommendation 4.5.1
That Council staff attend a
Special Board Meeting of the Arakwal Corporation to discuss the Masterplans
for Mullumbimby, Bangalow, and Byron Bay. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
committee Reports - Infrastructure Services
|
Report No. 14.4 Report
of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 16 May 2018
File No: I2018/948
|
18-382
|
Resolved that Council note the minutes of the Local Traffic
Committee Meeting held on 16 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-383
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 7.2 Mercato - Byron Bay Woolworth Site re-development
request for variation to traffic management arrangements
File No: I2018/908
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council support the use of
Butler Street, Byron Bay for construction access for concrete deliveries
until the re-development works are completed or Council commences the
construction of the Byron Bay Bypass, which occurs earliest. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 14.5 Report
of the Water, Waste and Sewer Advisory Committee Meeting held on 31 May 2018
File No: I2018/1079
|
18-384
|
Resolved that Council
note the minutes of the Water, Waste and Sewer Advisory Committee Meeting
held on 31 May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-385
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report No. 4.1 Sewage Treatment Plant
EPA Licence Sites
File No:
I2018/619
Committee Recommendation 4.1.1
1. That
the Council note the report.
2. That
the Council note that the Oceans Shores Constructed Wetland is a serpentine
channel. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-386
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report No. 4.2 Mullumbimby Sewerage
System Inflow and Infiltration Programme - update
File No:
I2018/645
Committee Recommendation 4.2.1
1. That
Council support the Inflow and Infiltration (I/I)
Project as outlined in the report (page 17 of the Agenda) and recognising the
social impact on dwellings that are invited to participate, including at
least that participants will:
(a) provide
space for a sewer pump pod;
(b) allow
connection to the electricity supply;
(c) run
the risk of water logging of their or their neighbours’ yards due to
storm water not entering sewers; and
(d) participate
with Council in remediating in water logging.
2. That
Council consider allocating a resource to ensure social and ecological
aspects resulting from the project are considered in conjunction with works.
(Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-387
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 4.3 Recycled Water Strategic Management Strategy
File No: I2018/646
Committee
Recommendation 4.3.1
That Council put the Recycled
Water Strategic Management Strategy (Rev 3. Attachment #E2018/43453) on
public exhibition for 28 days and, if no submissions are received, adopt it
or, if submissions are received, send to Council. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-388
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 4.4 Data on bins that have fallen over in rural areas
File No: I2018/647
Committee
Recommendation 4.4.1
That Council note the report and
the subsequent information that 25 rural bins over 3 years period have fallen
over prior to collection. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-389
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report
No. 4.5 Legislation relating to the Domestic Waste
Management Charge
File No: I2018/897
Committee
Recommendation 4.5.1
That Council note the report. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-390
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee Recommendation(s):
Report No. 4.6 Murtagh Wetlands Report
File No:
I2018/952
Committee Recommendation 4.6.1
1. That
Council review the state and performance of the West Byron STP Constructed
Wetlands and 24 Ha Melaleuca Wetland and advise on future management.
2. That
a report on scoping of water sensitive design and whole of catchment plan to
integrate all works involving West Byron STP, Cape Byron Marine Park, Union
Drain Trust and the community come to the next meeting WWSAC.
3. That
the WWSAC receive a report on the current status of the old sand mining
drain/path and its impact on the Belongil catchment. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 14.6 Report
of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 31 May 2018
File No: I2018/1106
|
18-391
|
Resolved that
Council note the minutes of the Local Traffic Committee Meeting held on 31
May 2018. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
18-392
|
Resolved that Council adopt the following Committee
and Management Recommendation(s):
Report No. 6.1 Events - Byron Writers
Festival 2018 - Road Closure
File No:
I2018/906
Committee Recommendation 6.1.1
1. That
Council endorse the Byron Bay Writers Festival to be held on 3-5 August 2018,
that includes the installation of temporary regulatory signage including No
Stopping, No Parking and Disability Parking Signs between 8am and 6pm,
subject to conditions at:-
a. Bayshore
Drive, Byron Bay.
2. That
the approval provided in Part 1 is subject to:-
a. separate approvals by NSW Police and RMS being
obtained;
b. implementation of the approved Traffic Management
Plan and Traffic Control Plan, including the use of signed detours, as
designed and implemented by those with appropriate accreditation;
c. that the impact of the event be advertised via a
notice in the local weekly paper a minimum of one week prior to the
operational impacts taking effect, noting it must include the event name,
specifics of any traffic impacts or road closures and times, alternative
route arrangements, event organiser, a personal contact name and a telephone
number for all event related enquiries or complaints;
d. the event be notified on Council’s
webpage;
e. the event organiser:
i. undertake
consultation with community and affected businesses including adequate
response/action to any raised concerns;
ii. undertake
consultation with emergency services and any identified issues addressed; and
iii. hold
$20m public liability insurance cover which is valid for the event.
(Richardson/Cameron)
|
confidential
Reports - Sustainable Environment and Economy
|
Report No. 16.1 Confidential - Mullumbimby
Administration Building - Solar Installation
File No: I2018/530
|
18-393
|
Resolved:
1. That Council support the
installation of approximately 100kW solar panelled structure at
Council’s Mullumbimby Administration Building car park.
2. That Council allocate an
estimated project budget of $330,000 inclusive of all costs with funding
provided by the Employee Leave Entitlements Reserve.
3. That any savings generated from
electricity costs related to the Mullumbimby Administration Building be
reimbursed to the Employee Leave Entitlements Reserve until such time as the
capital investment incurred is recovered.
4. That Council receive a further report
on further solar options once the new electricity contract subject to a
procurement process has been finalised.
5. That this report and attachment
#E2018/47068 remain confidential. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
confidential Reports -
Infrastructure Services
|
Report No. 16.2 Confidential - Tender Assessment
Report - Belongil Entrance Opening Strategy
File No: I2018/932
|
18-394
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council award Tender Belongil Creek Entrance Opening Strategy to Alluvium
Consulting Australia Pty Ltd.
2. That Council makes public its decision, including the name and
amount of the successful tenderer, in accordance with Clause 179(b) of the
Local Government (General) Regulation 2005. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Report No. 16.4 Confidential - Expression of Interest
20017-0069 Bioenergy Project
File No: I2018/1052
|
18-395
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council shortlist the following companies to participate in a tender for a
Bankable Feasibility Study for the Byron Bay Bioenergy Facility:
a) Aquatec
Maxcon
b) HZ-Inova
c) Opec
Systems
d) Skala
e) Stark
Group
2. That Council makes public its decision, including the name and
amount of the successful tenderer, in accordance with Clause 179(b) of the Local
Government (General) Regulation 2005.
3. That Council allocate $250,000
from the Sewer Section 64 funds for the Bankable Feasibility Study for
the Byron Bay Bioenergy Facility.
4. That Council prepare grant
applications for the construction phase of the Byron Bay Bioenergy Facility.
5. That Council prepare
documents to seek long term contracts to secure Byron Shire’s food
waste and fats, oils and grease (grease traps) feedstocks. (Richardson/Cameron)
|
|
Procedural
MotionS
|
18-396
|
Resolved that Council change the order of business to deal
with items 9.3, 13.1, 13.9, 13.11, 13.13, 13.14, 13.27, 16.3, 8.2 next on the
Agenda. (Richardson/Ndiaye)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
18-397
|
Resolved that the vote on Reservation of Items for Debate
be recommitted in order to allow Cr Spooner to leave the Chamber in
accordance with his earlier declared pecuniary interest in Report 13.3. (Richardson/Ndiaye)
Cr Spooner left the Chamber at 11.12am.
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
Cr Spooner was not present for the vote.
Cr Spooner returned to the meeting at 11.13am.
|
notices of motion
|
Notice of Motion No. 9.3 Lots
Identified
File No: I2018/1089
|
18-398
|
Resolved that an amendment to Chapter
B14.2 of DCP 2014 be prepared as part of the next House Keeping DCP amendment/s
by adding the following clause to the Prescriptive Measure in DCP –
Chapter B14 – Excavation and Fill:
Lots that
are identified as having stability
problems either on Council’s GIS mapping or through the development
assessment process (slopes greater than 15 degrees, land that has
historically been used for uncontrolled filling, or land that has is
constrained by springs or wet areas etc.) are to adequately address
geotechnical constraints through the submission of a detailed geotechnical
report prepared by a suitably qualified professional. The development
application shall also incorporating preliminary design detail for footings,
driveways and storm water management to demonstrate how the risk is can be
adequately managed. In certain circumstances the geotechnical constraints
will prevent properties from being developed for infill development and
applications will not be approved. (Coorey/Richardson)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Staff Reports - Corporate and Community
Services
|
Report No. 13.1 Proposed
Amendments to Council's Code of Meeting Practice
File No: I2018/789
|
18-399
|
Resolved that Council:
1. Note the attached submissions
received in relation to the draft amendments to Clause 22 and Schedule A of
the Code of Meeting Practice (E2018/16039).
2. Adopt the draft amendments to
Clause 22 and Schedule A of the Code of Meeting Practice with the following
amendments:
- 22.6 A
person/organisation is permitted to speak in favour of or against up to 2
items on the agenda.
- 22.8 the mayor will
invite councillors to ask questions of speakers at the conclusion of their
speech in favour of or against an item on the agenda, or on a submission.
3. Incorporate the adopted draft
amendments into the Code of Meeting Practice.
4. Update Council’s
Corporate Documents Register with the revised Code of Meeting Practice and
update the associated procedure (DM804466). (Lyon/Coorey)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Staff Reports - Sustainable
Environment and Economy
|
Report No. 13.9 CZMP
for the Eastern Precincts of the Byron Bay Embayment (Cape Byron to Main
Beach) - Engagement and Public Exhibition Outcome
File No: I2018/632
|
18-400
|
Resolved that the matter rest on the table. (Richardson/Coorey)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
Cr Hackett voted against the motion.
|
|
Report No. 13.11 PLANNING
- 26.2016.4.1 - Rural Function Centres - Results of Community Engagement
File No: I2018/798
|
|
Moved that Council:
1. Not proceed with
the Planning Proposal for the following reasons.
a) The
proposal for a wedding function use and other uses are inconsistent with the
zoning objectives for the RU2 zone as the proposed uses are not
‘associated with primary production and environmental
conservation’.
b) The
proposal introduces a range of uses other than wedding functions that are
inconsistent with RU2 zone objectives and that these additional uses and
impacts have not been adequately addressed in the planning proposal.
c) The
draft controls in the proposed clause are unnecessarily qualified with the
potential to further erode the amenity of rural residents when standards need
to be unambiguous, prescriptive and clearly stated.
d) The
proposal for weddings and other functions is an imposition on rural amenity
that can not be reasonably ‘balanced’.
e) The
proposed controls do not adequately consider impacts on community
infrastructure especially roads.
2. Engage
with community and the wedding industry to develop a ‘well managed and
sustainable industry for all’ that particularly examines existing facilities
in zones with objectives that can accommodate weddings and other functions. (Cameron/Coorey)
|
|
Procedural
Motion
|
18-401
|
Resolved that Cr Cameron
be granted a two minute extension to his speech.
(Richardson/Coorey)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
AMENDMENT
Moved that Council:
1. Forward
the Planning Proposal at Attachment 2 (#E2018/46690) to the NSW Department of
Planning and Environment for a Gateway determination, to amend Byron Local
Environmental Plan 2014 to permit function centres in the RU2 Rural Landscape
Zone with development consent and subject to appropriate controls relating to
site suitability and management.
2. In
keeping with the commitment to value, protect and enhance farming in the Shire,
not proceed with allowing function centres in the RU1 Primary Produce Zone.
3. Agree
that staff can proceed to public exhibition of the Planning Proposal and
government agency consultation based on the Gateway determination issued by the
NSW Department of Planning and Environment, and report back to Council as part
of post-exhibition reporting.
4. Investigate
the possibility of implementing a registration system for approved rural
function centres, and report back to Council as part of the post-exhibition
reporting.
(Richardson/Spooner)
Cr Hunter declared a non-pecuniary interest in this
matter during the meeting. The interest being that a part of his property is in
the RU1 zone. He elected to remain in the Chamber, participate in the
discussion and vote.
|
Procedural
MotionS
|
18-402
|
Resolved that Cr Richardson
be granted a two minute extension to his speech.
(Ndiaye/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
18-403
|
Resolved that Cr Coorey
be granted a two minute extension to her speech.
(Richardson/Hackett)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
The amendment (Richardson/Spooner) was put to the vote
and declared lost.
Crs Ndiaye, Richardson, Spooner and Hunter voted in
favour of the amendment.
Crs Coorey, Martin, Lyon, Cameron and Hackett voted
against the amendment.
The motion (Cameron/Coorey) was put to the vote and
declared lost.
Crs Coorey, Richardson, Cameron and Hackett voted in
favour of the motion.
Crs Martin, Lyon, Ndiaye, Spooner and Hunter voted
against the motion.
FORESHADOWED MOTION
18-404
|
Resolved that
Council:
1. Forward
the Planning Proposal at Attachment 2 (#E2018/46690) with the following
amendment to 6(10) 2 (c) and (d), to the NSW Department of Planning and
Environment for a Gateway determination, to amend Byron Local Environmental
Plan 2014 to permit function centres in the RU2 Rural Landscape Zone with
development consent and subject to appropriate controls relating to site
suitability and management.
- 6(10)
2 (c) ensure that all amplified music will cease no later than 8.00pm;
and
- 6(10)
2 (d) ensure that all event attendees will be off-site no later than
8.30pm; and
2. In
keeping with the commitment to value, protect and enhance farming in the
Shire, not proceed with allowing function centres in the RU1 Primary Produce
Zone.
3. Agree
that staff can proceed to public exhibition of the Planning Proposal and
government agency consultation based on the Gateway determination issued by
the NSW Department of Planning and Environment, and report back to Council as
part of post-exhibition reporting.
4. Investigate
the possibility of implementing a registration system for approved rural
function centres, and report back to Council as part of the post-exhibition
reporting. (Lyon/Spooner)
The motion (Lyon/Spooner) was put to the vote and
declared carried.
Crs Martin, Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Hackett, Spooner
and Hunter voted in favour
Crs Coorey and Cameron voted against the motion.
|
The meeting adjourned at
12.37pm for lunch and reconvened at 1.30pm.
|
Procedural
Motion
|
18-405
|
Resolved that Council change the order of business to deal
with Reports 13.14 and 9.2 next on the Agenda. (Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
|
Report No. 13.14 Barrio
Eatery and Bar - Update on Resolution 18-170
File No: I2018/907
|
18-406
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council note the report.
2. That
council request further reports from Council staff in another three months and
six months to ensure all promised works have been carried out and that sound
levels now comply with the NSW Industrial Noise Policy, per the DA . (Lyon/Richardson)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
notices of motion
|
Notice of Motion No. 9.2 Support
for the Uluru Statement from the Heart
File No: I2018/1086
|
18-407
|
Resolved that
Council:
1. Supports
the Uluru Statement from the Heart
2. Will
be a signatory to the ACOSS statement of support for the Uluru
Statement
3. Acknowledges
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as the Traditional Owners of this
country and pay respect their ongoing spiritual and cultural connections with
it.
4. Recognises
the need for constitutional change that goes beyond the symbolic and the
benefits that a treaty offers all Australians.
5. Thanks
those who gathered at the 2017 National Constitutional Convention in Uluru
for your persistence and patience, under the guidance of the co-chairs of the
referendum Counsel, Ms Pat Anderson AO and Mr Mark Leibler AC.
6. Lodge
a submission to the Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition
Relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.
7. That
Council provide a press release including the Uluru Statement from the Heart
and our support for it. (Richardson/Ndiaye)
The
motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
|
Procedural
Motion
|
18-408
|
Resolved that Report No 13.9 be lifted from the table. (Richardson/Ndiaye)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Staff Reports - Sustainable Environment
and Economy
|
Report No. 13.9 CZMP
for the Eastern Precincts of the Byron Bay Embayment (Cape Byron to Main
Beach) - Engagement and Public Exhibition Outcome
File No: I2018/632
CONTINUED
|
18-409
|
Resolved:
1. That, subject to the receipt and
consideration of the legal advice referred to in the body of this report, Council
adopts the draft CZMP for the Eastern Precincts of the Byron Bay Embayment
(Cape Byron to Main Beach) as amended in accordance with the recommendations
outlined in Attachment 2 (#E2018/45410) of this report.
2. That the CZMP as adopted be submitted
to the Minister for certification.
3. That Council note the timeframes
for delivery of the draft CZMP. (Hackett/Richardson)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
|
Report No. 13.13 PLANNING
- Residential Strategy - Accessible Housing Project (Housing Summit
Action)
File No: I2018/889
|
18-410
|
Resolved that Council:
1. Note
the report and thank staff for the work to date on the Accessible Housing
Project initiative.
2. Endorse,
subject to budget allocation in the 2018/19 Budget, the allocation of $50,000
to fund a 6 month planning position to prioritise the finalisation of the
residential strategy by end of year.
3. Note
that staff will further refine and tailor for Byron Shire the accessible
housing planning mechanisms (principles/objectives/roles/terms and conditions
in the report) as part of the finalisation of the residential strategy in
conjunction with experts across relevant fields.
4. Research
the economic, social and construction benefits of adopting a minimum 15-30%
of developable area to all land dedications made for the purposes of
Accessible Housing provision.
5. Notify
Accessible Housing Project initiative land owners of 1-3 above. In particular
land owners of sites 2 and 5 to be advised of the prerequisites for their
land being considered by Council for potential rezoning should they seek to
lodge stand alone planning proposals for this land ahead of the residential
strategy. (Spooner/Lyon)
|
|
Procedural
Motion
|
18-411
|
Resolved that Cr Spooner be granted a one minute
extension to his speech.
(Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
The motion (Spooner/Lyon) was put to the vote and
declared carried.
Crs Coorey, Martin,
Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett, Spooner and Hunter voted in favour
of the motion.
No Councillors voted
against the motion.
Staff Reports - Infrastructure
Services
|
Report No. 13.27 Biobanking
for Byron Bay Bypass - Dedication Of Land
File No: I2018/1051
|
18-412
|
Resolved that Council
dedicates lots:
- Lot
7, DP 809005
- Lot
24, DP 845454
- Lot
46, DP 848543
- Lot
47, DP 854800
In addition to Lot 66, DP 863772 Lilli Pilli Drive, Byron
Bay for the purposes of BioBanking as an offset to the impact of the
construction of the Byron Bay Bypass. (Coorey/Lyon)
The motion was put to the
vote and declared carried.
|
CONFIDENTIAL Reports -
Infrastructure Services
I
|
Report No. 16.3 Confidential - 2017-0050 EOI:
Redevelopment of 1 Broken Head Road, Byron Bay
File No: I2018/867
|
|
Moved:
1. That
pursuant to Section 11(3) of the Local Government Act, 1993, resolve that the
Annexures to the report, 2017-0050 EOI: Redevelopment of 1 Broken Head Rd,
Byron Bay are to be treated as confidential as they relate to matters
specified in s10A(2)(d)i of the Local Government Act 1993.
2. That
Council decline to invite tenders for the Sth Byron STP site
3 That
Council begin an engagement process for improved transparency that enables
community input into the process
4. That
a report be presented back to Council. (Coorey/Cameron)
|
|
Procedural
Motion
|
18-413
|
Resolved that Cr Ndiaye be granted a one minute extension
to her speech.
(Richardson/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
AMENDMENT
18-414
|
Resolved:
1. That
pursuant to Section 11(3) of the Local Government Act, 1993, resolve that the
Annexures to the report, 2017-0050 EOI: Redevelopment of 1 Broken Head Rd,
Byron Bay are to be treated as confidential as they relate to matters
specified in s10A(2)(d)i of the Local Government Act 1993.
2. That Council short-list the
following proponents to participate in the selective request for tender
process:
a) The
Living School Byron Bay Pty Ltd
b) National
Affordable Housing Consortium Ltd
c) Powerwrap
Limited (Archiblox Pty Ltd)
d) The
Trustee for Harrison Developments Discretionary Trust (The Village Retirement
Group)
3. That those submissions focused on
environmental education and showcasing be invited to work alongside Council
to see if this outcome can be achieved at either the West Byron STP or the
Vallances Road Sustainability Precinct. (Spooner/Ndiaye)
|
Cr Martin left the meeting at
2:25pm and did not return.
|
Procedural MotionS
|
18-415
|
Resolved that Cr Spooner be granted a two minute extension
to his speech. (Richardson/Ndiaye)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
18-416
|
Resolved that Cr Richardson
be granted a two minute extension to his speech.
(Ndiaye/Cameron)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
The amendment (Spooner/Ndiaye) was put to the vote and
declared carried.
Crs Coorey and Cameron voted against the amendment.
The amendment upon becoming the substantive motion was
put to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey and Cameron voted against the motion.
mayoral minute
|
Mayoral Minute No. 8.1 Update
- Short Term Holiday Let Government Announcement
File No: I2018/1096
|
18-417
|
Resolved that
Council:
1. Acknowledges
the legitimate role short term holiday letting can play as part of the suite
of visitor accommodation provision;
2. Note
the disappointing lack of planning clarity thus far shared via press releases
concerning short term holiday letting;
3. Note
the disappointing absence of engagement of any form with Byron Shire in the 8
months since the close of the formal consultation period in October 2017;
4. Reinforce
that, due to the disproportionate percentage of dwellings being used for
short term holiday letting within the Byron Shire, a blanket approach to
planning regulation via a state policy is a major cause for concern;
5. Request
support from MP’s Ben Franklin and Tamara Smith to assist in convening
a meeting with the Minister for Planning in order for council to seek a
deferral of Byron Shire from the new state wide planning policy (pause to
implementation). (Richardson)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
|
Mayoral Minute No. 8.2 General
Manager Recruitment
File No: I2018/1101
Mark
Arnold, Acting General Manager, left the meeting in accordance with his
earlier declared pecuniary interest in this matter.
|
18-418
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council note the report at Confidential Attachment 1 (E2018/49761) and
appoint Candidate #4 on a 5-year senior staff contract, at the current total
remuneration package (TRP), in accordance with the Office of Local
Government’s Standard Contract for the Employment of General Managers.
2. That
Attachment 1 become publicly available. (Richardson)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Mark Arnold, Acting General Manager, returned to the
Chamber at 3.08pm.
Notices of Motion
|
Notice of Motion No. 9.1 A Zero Waste
Target for Byron Shire
File No: I2018/1076
|
18-419
|
Resolved:
1. Adopts
a ‘Zero Waste Target’ across the Shire and includes this
objective in our Integrated Waste Strategies and Management Plans.
2. Supports
a circular economy model approach to manage its resource recovery, with an
expressed desire for an innovative waste management strategic focus (with
zero waste to landfill aspirations).
3. Seeks
regional support, through the Northern Rivers Joint Organisation, and other
regional waste bodies, to encourage or incentivise businesses that will
manufacture or create product from the recycled product in the region and to
develop a region wide zero waste target.
4. Support
the Northern Rivers Joint Organisation identified priority in waste
management to proceed with and complete a detailed feasibility study for a
regional AWT facility.
5. Write
to the Relevant Minister, requesting:
a) That the NSW Government
investigate further options for reforming the waste levy grant system,
including providing greater flexibility in the grant guidelines for waste
management projects.
b) That the NSW Government
investigate opportunities to enhance the collaborative powers of Regional
Organisations of Councils to encourage investment in waste facilities, to be
funded by the waste levy.
c) That the NSW Environment
Protection Authority provide additional support to local councils and
resource recovery organisations to meet recycling targets and manage issues
such as stream contamination, bureaucratic barriers, lack of product
stewardship, and limited market opportunities.
d) That the NSW Environment
Protection Authority urgently investigate, identify and implement alternative
solutions to the ban on the importation of recyclable plastics by China
e) That the NSW Environment
Protection Authority, in collaboration with stakeholders, investigate
opportunities to embed zero waste strategies and the circular economy in New
South Wales.
6. Write to Tamara Smith MLA and
Ben Franklin MLC seeking their support and advocacy within NSW Parliament. (Richardson/Ndiaye)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Petitions
1.
Non-Chemical Means of Weed Control in Byron Shire
The Mayor tabled the
following petition with 202 signatures which states:
“We, the undersigned, request that Byron Shire
Council replace its use of glyphosate products with non-chemical weed control.
Council has been presented with scientifically documented information regarding
the negative impact of glyphosate on human, animal and environmental health and
also supplied with information on alternative products used by other councils.”
Delegates'
Reports
|
Delegate's Report No. 12.1 Law
Enforcement Conduct Commission Hearing Operation Tambora - 26-28 March 2018
File No: I2018/1099
|
|
Delegate notes
provided by Nicqui Yazdi for the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Hearing
Operation Tambora, held 26-28 March 2018 in Sydney, are included as
Attachment 1 to the Report titled “Public Hearing into Byron Bay Police
Actions – outcome” in this Agenda.
Signed: Cr
Simon Richardson
|
2. Future of
Local Government – Smart Councils, Strong Communities, 30-31 May
2018
Cr Coorey advised Council:
The Future of Local Government National Summit, which
Anna Vinfield attended as well, was really great, really inspiring, and the
future of Local Government seems to suggest that the community works harder and
we will work with them rather than us doing all the work. I am paraphrasing,
that’s not the case but it was really very much about engagement as you
can probably imagine and there was some really innovative and exciting things
there. One that I liked especially was by a man from Victoria, who has
developed a sharing economy platform called B-Hive but it is a sharing economy
that is limited to the local area. So it has the effect of rather than Airbnb
or Amazon or those companies that don’t create anything in the
neighbourhood they just are a retail platform for taking away funds, this is
actually one that you have membership of. It is a sharing economy for a variety
of possibilities. I won’t go into the entire model here, I’d
actually probably like to bring that man up here. But it is a way we can share
accommodation, it’s a way we can share cars, it’s a way we can
share tasks, like Airtasker does, but at a local level which is really about
returning the economy of sharing back to the local area.
There was some really interesting ideas about how we talk
to the community, especially with regards to Council business. One was actually
about having open source policy documents so that people could write into them.
So that you have the input as it is being drafted. Someone might hate that, I
thought it was kind of exciting. You know you could end up with a
“dog’s breakfast” but maybe it’s a point where people
can put things in like a Wikipedia entry, or Google Doc, and it is just a way
of collaborating with your community. Maybe you don’t let everyone do it
but it was an interesting way of looking at things.
A lot of people spoke about a model of Councillors as a
board of directors is very out-dated and we shouldn’t really be looking
to be that but rather community connectors and I think that was a nice way of
thinking about that and I think most of us probably do feel we are community
connectors but sometimes it is easy to feel like you are the board of directors
and you take responsibility for everything.
The other interesting thing I like, which possibly is
counter intuitive to some of the things we are doing with the Joint Councils
Organisation was actually localising procurement, but there are ways that you
can return funds to your local area. We do that with some of our providers but
that was one thing that I thought was interesting.
Some of these things are possibly what Council staff are
already looking at and I think one of the things that I did take away from that
was that Byron Councillors are way ahead of most other people in the game in so
much of the stuff that was brought up I thought “yeah we are already
doing that”, “don’t need to hear this speech, we are already
doing that”. So that was really good as well. I think next time it would
be really good for some of us to go down and present on how we went with the
CSP process, because there are other people that haven’t done that sort
of thing yet and it would be good to have a good report on that.
The other thing I liked that I mentioned earlier was
having a Councillor cafe, which one of the councils was doing, I think it was
one of the inner city councils of Melbourne. The week after business papers
come out, you set aside a time and people come and talk to you about stuff, so
that might be another way of looking at engaging our people rather than just
the imperfect and somewhat blinded instrument that public access is.
There are a few other things but some of them require
longer than the 3 minutes I have been given so I will put it in a written
report. But thank you, it was a great experience.
Cr Martin provided the following report:
While organised by the Municipal Association of Victoria,
Future of Local Govern -ment National Summit was attended by councillors and
staff from every state in Australia.
Two days of presentations on a wide variety of topics
were focussed on how many councils are experimenting with innovation and
collaboration with their communities. Due to the rapidly changing
expectations of the public across the country, the courageous councils that are
listening are reinventing their services to include greater participative
processes, greater transparency and clearer communication channels with
their constituents.
I now understand to a greater degree, how fortunate the
population of the Byron Shire are to currently have a council that is ahead of
its game in so many areas in comparis on to many others. There is,
however, still room for improvement and new ideas.
The issue that echoed through the whole event to me was
that, while many councils are offering more scope for community
consultation and this is already evident in Byron Shire with the Community
Solutions Panel, Masterplan groups and the various panels and committees that
exist already, the challenge lies in council letting go and not micromanaging
projects.
Transformation can only successful when the General
Manager, executive staff and councillors work as at team to develop a shared
vision of community collaboration and most importantly, are prepared to take
risks.
As reiterated at the summit, there is no roadmap that
will meet the needs of every community. There will be trials and there
will be errors from time to time. Council staff need to be supported with open,
honest and robust conversations, training and removing the threat to jobs if a
process perhaps doesn’t initially work exactly how we had
hoped. We all need to be constantly questioning our own practices
but also taking confidence in our decisions as transformation leaders. We need
to acknowledge that it is a just process of continuous improvement. No doubt,
our Byron Shire Community will certainly let us know when they perceive we have
tripped up.
Of the many great ideas presented at the Summit, one
suggestion that could have great benefit to council and our community would be
to include the details of how the community was consulted with each report
– when, where, which stakeholders were involved etc. When the
comments come in of “why wasn’t I consulted” or
“council didn’t consult” councillors and staff can have this
information at hand.
Another suggestion was referring to our community members
as “citizens”. This is an empowering term that encourages
involvement in civic life rather than the all too common expectation of
“we pay – you fix”.
While we do currently have annual community awards - a
regular – perhaps monthly or quarterly “Local Legend award”
can recognise citizens who are actively engaged – possibly even the more
challenging and vocal ones. An award on a more timely basis could promote our
vision of community collaboration. A simple certificate, photo with
the Mayor and perhaps a Byron Shire reusable coffee cup could accompany the
promotion of each winner and what they have done to earn the award in the local
newspapers, Council’s facebook, and website etc.
In a packed program the presentations that stood out for
me were:
·
Tiny House Villages as a solution to the affordable housing
crisis being experiences all around the nation – particular reference to
Victorian models at Wallan, Mt Alexander, Wallan and Maribynong.
·
Forming small working groups on a particular subject with up
to three meetings to acknowledge the experience, passion and skills that exist
in the community and gather their ideas on a subject.
·
Youth Leadership program where 40 kids were given $5000 to run
their own project (understanding that the process was as important as the
outcome)
·
The term – “Messy democracy” and the courage
required in learning how to be community led.
·
The value of councils supporting their own local economy
rather than seeking the best price.
·
The Banyule Transition movement – changing focus from an
industrial growth society to a life sustaining Society.
·
The BHive Share Economy project in Bendigo again with a focus
on localisation.
·
LogoNet Australian networking with individuals working on Local
Government and community governance models – exploring new ideas and also
the recognition that there are State Government barriers to local government
giving more control over to communities.
I am very grateful for the opportunity to attend this conference
and suggest that next year – Byron Shire Council could present at the
summit reporting on the myriad of ways we are engaging with our community
– the challenges and the benefits.
3. National General Assembly, Canberra, June 2018
Cr Lyon advised Council:
I went to Canberra and had some good fun. I do enjoy
conferences and networking with other Local Government people and just
understanding how/where people are coming from. I’ve got to say we are
certainly in the minority when it comes to certain issues. The coal debate is
one, the Uluru Statement, just some things that show that we have a really big
leadership role here because we are in the right and they are in the wrong and
we have to keep shining that light. We are the leaders of progressive change
and you can see that. Things that we were talking about 20 years ago, the
policies that are enacted today, so we need to keep those efforts up.
I appreciated the opportunity to go. Thanks for that.
Cr Ndiaye advised Council:
Thank you for the opportunity to go down from 22 degrees
to 2 degrees, for 5 days. It was very heartening to meet up with people from
across the country and see what issues are burning in their neck of the woods,
but also see the commonalities. While it looks, first of all I thought
gosh this is going to be stacked very conservatively but when it came to some
crucial issues that maybe 10 years ago wouldn’t have gone through, I
thought we got through a whole heap. All the stuff around waste management is
right at the forefront. Stuff about constitutional recognition came forward. We
got a fairly good speech from Bill Shorten which was very engaging; less so
Malcolm (Turnbull).
But throughout, there was some incredible presentations,
one particularly that stood out was about representation of women in Local
Government and that at the CEO and managerial level, despite 20 years of
effort, we are still sitting at around 10-15% representation, at that level and
throughout Local Government. Some areas are better than others, but it was a
good wake up call for us all to help support some of our young and
up-and-coming women to continue to speak up and have their say within our
community. I think we are doing a good job here. Of course, those science
presentation that we got from Dr Veena
Sahajwalla, she is a presenter on the SBS, on her micro-factories that
she has been working on and some accelerated progress in that area that is
really exciting. Solar technology taking off across the country where it
wasn’t before. Conversations about all sorts of things that I thought
were quite inspiring. Thank you for the opportunity.
4. NOROC Meeting
Cr Richardson advised Council:
Tomorrow NOROC will be holding a meeting which will be to
transfer into a Joint Organisation. The difference that will be, other than the
stationery rebranding, is yet to be determined. But just to flag, anyone is
more than welcome to come along to that at Lismore Chambers.
5. Arakwal MoU
Cr Richardson advised Council:
One committee meeting that might be worth sharing is the
Arakwal MoU Committee. We have to recommit ourselves to keep engaging with the
Arakwal mob, earlier rather than later. I know we have been hearing this a bit
today. One of the concepts, traditionally what we did was to make sure that
every committee has an invitation for the Arakwal to come, so they are a
member; if they don’t come we just think ‘oh well, that’s the
way it goes, we are trying’. It was pretty clear there, they don’t
come, they won’t come, they don’t like to come in that way, so we
need to adjust how we engage. Whether it is every 6 months giving them a 3-4
hour more personalised briefing. They used the example of the Masterplan in
Byron as a great example of that, that we went to them, met them a lot, talked
them through the issues, and they were content; as opposed to some of the
Mullumbimby Masterplan conversations where, even though they are technically a
member, and they haven’t been, they are saying ‘well, don’t
just dump it on us now and get our tick and then flick us,’ so to speak.
That came out again too that different people need to be engaged with in
different ways. So from the Arakwal mob I think we need to just get a bit more
in the habit of going to them, rather than expecting them to come to us.
Cr Ndiaye further advised Council:
One of the things they are really clear on is that for us
to all be aware of how many things we are inviting them to engage on and the
amount of paperwork and all that other stuff associated. Also, the knowledge
and understanding that goes with that. Not only that, but inviting them into a
meeting where they then need to fight with all the other community groups for
space to talk about things, was just not a great way to go. The other thing
that came out of that meeting which was incredible was the work that Belle
Arnold has been doing around identifying the other groups and agencies in the
area, outside of our area, that get funding to cover this area for health, for
mental health, accommodation, etc. They might be based in Ballina, Lismore,
Coffs, Tweed, and they are funded to cover this area but they are currently
not. There is a great injustice going on there and some brilliant work being
done to try and address that, which I thought was quite inspiring. Saddening,
firstly, but great to see that it was making headway in that area. I wonder how
many other things outside of the Indigenous realm where that is also happening.
Staff Reports - Corporate and
Community Services
|
Report No. 13.4 Mayor
and Councillor Fees 2018/2019
File No: I2018/890
|
18-420
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council fix the fee payable to each Councillor under Section 248 of the Local
Government Act 1993 for the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019 at $19,790.
2. That
Council fix the fee payable to the Mayor under section 249 of the Local
Government Act 1993, for the period from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2019 at
$43,170.
3. That
Council in accordance with its current practice not determine a fee payable
to the Deputy Mayor.
4. That
a letter be sent from Council to the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal
requesting that superannuation be included in Mayor and Councillor Fees.
5. That
Council write to Tamara Smith MLA and Ben Franklin MLC requesting advocacy on
this matter. (Ndiaye/Lyon)
The motion
was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
|
Report No. 13.7 LGNSW
Board Vacancy - Vice President (Rural/Regional Councils)
File No: I2018/1039
|
18-421
|
Resolved that Council
nominate Crs Ndiaye, Spooner and Cameron as voting delegates in the election
to fill the casual vacancy in the office of the Vice President
(Rural/Regional Councils) on the Board of the Local Government and Shires
Association of New South Wales.
(Ndiaye/Richardson)
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Staff Reports - Sustainable Environment
and Economy
|
Report No. 13.12 Adoption
of Constitution for Strategic Business Panel
File No: I2018/835
|
18-422
|
Resolved that Council
adopt the Constitution of the Strategic Business Panel at Attachment 1
(#E2018/2442) with the following amendment to 2. Purpose:
The purpose of the Strategic Business Panel is to
discuss various themes or strategic topics relevant to the business community
in the Byron Shire to
generate and sustain employment and business investment that will strengthen
the local economy in a sustainable manner by:
A. Identifying
regulatory issues that impede or otherwise restrict the business community.
B. Developing strategies
and policies that could assist local businesses and non performing council
owned assets achieve their goals.
Four key areas:
1.
Emerging industries
2.
Public Private Partnerships
3. Enabling infrastructure
4.
Planning and Design (Hunter/Spooner)
Cr Ndiaye left the meeting at 3.48pm.
The motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
Cr Ndiaye was not present for the vote.
|
|
Report No. 13.18 PLANNING
- Status report - Resolution 17-575 - Plan of Management for Railway Park
File No: I2018/973
|
18-423
|
Resolved:
1. That
a Strategic Planning Workshop be arranged to allow staff to brief Councillors
on the recommended Plan of Management and the process for its adoption.
2. That, unless
otherwise agreed at that Strategic Planning Workshop, staff arrange
for the public exhibition of the draft Plan of Management, in accordance
with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1993; including
arrangements for an independently chaired Public Hearing at the
completion of the exhibition period.
3. That
a post-exhibition report be brought to Council, including conclusions
and recommendations from the Public Hearing, to allow the adoption of a
Plan of Management for Railway Park by the end of the calendar year.
4. That
if Council determines the rotunda remains within Railway Park the Plan of
Management to include provision for an Expression of Interest process for use
of the rotunda by community groups. (Spooner/Hunter)
Cr Ndiaye
returned to the meeting at 3.54pm.
The motion
was put to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey,
Lyon, Ndiaye, Richardson, Hackett, Spooner and Hunter voted in favour of the
motion.
Cr Cameron
voted against the motion.
|
|
Report No. 13.21 PLANNING
- Development Application 10.2018.110.1 Tourist and Visitor Accommodation
(Twelve (12) Cabins including Use of Existing Structures as Storage and Staff
Lunchroom and Construction of Day Spa), Camping Ground (Two Hundred and
Thirty Nine (239) Sites), Park Entry Office/Kiosk, New Dwelling and
Recreation Facility (Indoors) - Yoga Facility at 1897 Coolamon Scenic Drive
Mullumbimby
File No: I2018/1050
|
|
Moved: That
Council defer consideration of Development Application 10.2018.110.1 until
the 2 August 2018 Ordinary Meeting to enable the applicant to amend the
application to satisfy current reasons for refusal as listed below:
1) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal conflicts with State Environmental
Planning Policy Coastal Management.
2) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposal will not conflict with State Environmental Planning
Policy No. 44 – Koala Habitat.
3) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal conflicts with State Environmental
Planning Policy Rural Lands (2008).
4) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposal complies with State Environmental Planning Policy
No. 55 Remediation of Land.
5) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal plans are inconsistent with the
Basix Certificate submitted and therefore does not comply with State
Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004.
6) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposal complies with State Environmental Planning Policy
– Infrastructure 2007.
7) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposal is a permissible use as stipulated in the land use
table and does not achieve the objectives of the 1(a) zone of the Byron
LEP 1988.
8) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, a kiosk is not a permissible use as stipulated
in the land use table and does not achieve the objectives of the zone of the
Byron LEP 2014.
9) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to satisfy Clause 6.3 Flood
Planning and 6.4 Flood Risk Management, Clause 6.2 Earthworks and
Clause 6.6 Services of the Byron LEP 2014.
10) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to address Clause 5.10 Heritage
Conservation of the Byron LEP 2014 in relation to Aboriginal Cultural
Heritage
11) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to satisfy
12) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to satisfy Clause 6.8 Rural and
nature Based Tourism of the Byron LEP 2014, having regards to the size and
scale of the development.
13) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposed development complies with the applicable chapters
of the Byron Shire Development Control Plan (BSDCP) 2010.
14) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposed development complies or can be reasonably
conditioned to comply with Chapter 11 Mullumbimby of the Byron Shire
Development Control Plan (BSDCP) 2010.
15) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposed development complies or can be conditioned to
comply with:
· Chapter
B2 Preservation of Trees and Other Vegetation
· Chapter
B3 Services.
· Chapter
B4 Traffic Planning, Vehicle Parking, Circulation and Access
· Chapter
B5 Providing for Cycling
· Chapter
B7 Mosquitoes and Biting Midges
· Chapter
B8 Waste Minimisation and Management
· Chapter
B9 Landscaping
· Chapter
B12 Social Impact Assessment Landscaping
· Chapter
B13 Access and Mobility
· Chapter
B14 Excavation and Fill
· Chapter
D2 Residential Accommodation and Ancillary Development
· Chapter
D3 Tourist Accommodation
· Chapter
D4 Commercial and Retail Development
· Chapter
E3 Mullumbimby
of the Byron Shire Development Control Plan (BSDCP)
2014.
16) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the likely impacts of the development will
have an adverse cumulative impact on the intended rural context, setting,
streetscape and public domain.
17) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the likely impacts of the development on the
natural environment.
18) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
ensures the proposal complies with Management of Contaminated Land Policy.
19) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal will not be compatible with the desired
streetscape within and adjoining the site, and has failed to adequately
address bushfire affecting the site.
20) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(d) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, submissions made in accordance with this Act or the
regulations identified issues relevant to the development application that
cannot be reasonably conditioned to ensure adverse impacts can be mitigated.
21) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(e) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, in the circumstances of the case, the proposal is an
overdevelopment of the site and approval of such would set an undesirable
precedent and is therefore not in the public interest.
22) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.12 of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the development is likely to result in a significant
affect on the local population of a threatened ecological community. (Richardson/Hunter)
Cr Ndiaye left the meeting at 4.05pm and did not
return.
|
AMENDMENT
18-424
|
Resolved that pursuant to Section 4.16 of the Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Development Application no.
10.2018.110.1 for a Tourist and Visitor Accommodation (twelve (12) cabins
including use of existing structures as storage and staff lunchroom and
construction of day spa), camping ground (two hundred and thirty nine (239)
sites), park entry office/kiosk, new dwelling and recreation facility
(indoors) - yoga facility, be recommended for refusal subject to the
following reasons:
1) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal conflicts with State Environmental
Planning Policy Coastal Management.
2) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposal will not conflict with State Environmental Planning
Policy No. 44 – Koala Habitat.
3) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal conflicts with State Environmental
Planning Policy Rural Lands (2008).
4) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposal complies with State Environmental Planning Policy
No. 55 Remediation of Land.
5) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal plans are inconsistent with the
Basix Certificate submitted and therefore does not comply with State
Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004.
6) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposal complies with State Environmental Planning Policy
– Infrastructure 2007.
7) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that demonstrates
the proposal is a permissible use as stipulated in the land use table and
does not achieve the objectives of the 1(a) zone of the Byron LEP 1988.
8) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, a kiosk is not a permissible use as stipulated
in the land use table and does not achieve the objectives of the zone of the
Byron LEP 2014.
9) Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to satisfy Clause 6.3 Flood
Planning and 6.4 Flood Risk Management, Clause 6.2 Earthworks and
Clause 6.6 Services of the Byron LEP 2014.
10) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to address Clause 5.10 Heritage
Conservation of the Byron LEP 2014 in relation to Aboriginal Cultural
Heritage
11) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to satisfy
12) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal fails to satisfy Clause 6.8 Rural and
nature Based Tourism of the Byron LEP 2014, having regards to the size and
scale of the development.
13) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposed development complies with the applicable chapters
of the Byron Shire Development Control Plan (BSDCP) 2010.
14) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposed development complies or can be reasonably
conditioned to comply with Chapter 11 Mullumbimby of the Byron Shire
Development Control Plan (BSDCP) 2010.
15) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
demonstrates the proposed development complies or can be conditioned to
comply with:
· Chapter
B2 Preservation of Trees and Other Vegetation
· Chapter
B3 Services.
· Chapter
B4 Traffic Planning, Vehicle Parking, Circulation and Access
· Chapter
B5 Providing for Cycling
· Chapter
B7 Mosquitoes and Biting Midges
· Chapter
B8 Waste Minimisation and Management
· Chapter
B9 Landscaping
· Chapter
B12 Social Impact Assessment Landscaping
· Chapter
B13 Access and Mobility
· Chapter
B14 Excavation and Fill
· Chapter
D2 Residential Accommodation and Ancillary Development
· Chapter
D3 Tourist Accommodation
· Chapter
D4 Commercial and Retail Development
· Chapter
E3 Mullumbimby
of the Byron Shire Development Control Plan (BSDCP)
2014.
16) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the likely impacts of the development will
have an adverse cumulative impact on the intended rural context, setting,
streetscape and public domain.
17) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the likely impacts of the development on the
natural environment.
18) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, insufficient information has been supplied that
ensures the proposal complies with Management of Contaminated Land Policy.
19) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the proposal will not be compatible with the desired
streetscape within and adjoining the site, and has failed to adequately
address bushfire affecting the site.
20) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(d) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, submissions made in accordance with this Act or the
regulations identified issues relevant to the development application that
cannot be reasonably conditioned to ensure adverse impacts can be mitigated.
21) Pursuant to
the provisions of Section 4.15 (1)(e) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, in the circumstances of the case, the proposal is an
overdevelopment of the site and approval of such would set an undesirable
precedent and is therefore not in the public interest.
22) Pursuant to the
provisions of Section 4.12 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment
Act 1979, the development is likely to result in a significant affect on
the local population of a threatened ecological community. (Cameron/Spooner)
|
The amendment (Cameron/Spooner) was put to the vote and
declared carried.
Crs Coorey, Lyon, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett and
Spooner voted in favour of the amendment.
Cr Hunter voted against the amendment.
The amendment upon becoming the substantive motion was
put to the vote and declared carried.
Crs Coorey, Lyon, Richardson, Cameron, Hackett and
Spooner voted in favour of the motion.
Cr Hunter voted against the motion.
|
Report No. 13.23 Actions
from Agriculture and Farm Consultation
File No: I2018/1063
|
18-425
|
Resolved that Council:
1. Note
the appointment of a Farm Liaison Officer is included in the 2018/19 draft
budget and recruitment is progressing.
2. Endorse
the establishment of a Farming Industry Cluster that ensures members are
representative of their farming sector and reports through to the Strategic
Business Panel.
3. Note
that agricultural specialist planner training will be provided to planning
staff to assist with farm specific Development Applications. (Hunter/Spooner)
The
motion was put to the vote and declared carried.
|
Staff Reports - Infrastructure
Services
|
Report No. 13.28 Update
on MR 545 Transport Studies
File No: I2018/1053
|
18-426
|
Resolved:
1. That
Council note the update on MR 545 Transport Studies; and
2. That
Council allocate a budget of $60,000 from the Byron Bay urban roads developer
contributions account to undertake design work for fauna fencing and
underpasses on Ewingsdale Road section of the MR545. (Coorey/Cameron)
The motion was put to the
vote and declared carried.
|
Questions
With Notice
|
Question With Notice No. 15.1 Brunswick
Valley Sewerage Treatment Plant
File No: I2018/1036
|
|
At Council’s
Ordinary Meeting held on 24 May 2018, Patricia Warren tabled the following
question which was taken on notice:
What were the design
parameters for the successful tender/contract for the construction of the
Brunswick Valley Sewerage Treatment Plant with specific reference to:
a) Average
Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) in ML/day and how was this determined?
b) Design
Capacity:-
(i) ADWF
in ML/day
(ii) buffer
in ML/day above ADWF and how was this determined and for what purpose?
(iii) total
design capacity in ML/day
c) hydraulic
design capacity in volume and velocity (litres/sec) at the head of the
plant?
Response Director Infrastructure Services:
a) Average
Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) in ML/day and how was this determined?
The design
inflows for the
Brunswick Valley STP were based on population and flow projections for the Mullumbimby and Brunswick Heads townships for the year 2025.
The Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) calculated on this basis is 3.8
ML/day.
The following table was included in the Tender Documents:
Table 1 Population and flow projections for Mullumbimby-Brunswick Heads STP (MBHSTP)
Population Group
|
2002
|
2025
|
ADWF (ML/day)
|
Permanent Population
|
5143
|
8805
|
2.70
|
Overnight Guests
|
2453
|
4502
|
0.90
|
Day Trippers
|
2250
|
4750
|
0.14
|
TOTAL
|
9846
|
18057
|
3.80
|
b) Design
Capacity:-
(i) ADWF
in ML/day
The ADWF is 3.8 ML/day
(ii) buffer in ML/day above ADWF and how was this
determined and for what purpose?
The design report for the facility states the STP is capable to
provide full biological treatment at the maximum sustained flow rate of 22
ML/day (5.8 x ADWF) and the maximum instantaneous flow rate of 27 ML/day (7.1
x ADWF).
The 5.8 ratio was derived by applying a Peak Wet Weather Flow to
Average Dry Weather Flow ratio of 7 x ADWF for the Mullumbimby Catchment and
5 x ADWF for the Brunswick Heads catchment.
When applied to the differing ADW flows in each catchment an average
of 5.8 x ADWF for the combined catchments is obtained.
(iii) total design capacity in ML/day
The design capacity for the Brunswick Valley STP is 3.8 ML/day for
Average Dry Weather Flow and a Peak Wet Weather Flow capacity of 22 ML/day
(3.8 x 5.8) and an instantaneous flow rate of 27 ML/day (3.8 x 7.1).
Since the Brunswick Valley STP has been in operation the plant has
never been hydraulically overloaded and remains comfortably within its design
parameters.
Council, however, has been monitoring the flow patterns and has
included in its latest business plan a dedicated flow mitigation project for
Mullumbimby and other areas in the Shire. This project has been
included in the latest budget which is currently on exhibition.
c) hydraulic design capacity in volume
and velocity (litres/sec) at the head of the plant?
The design report for the facility states hydraulic design capacity
for the inlet works in volume and velocity (litres/sec) at the head of the
plant is 7.1 x ADWF + 150 l/s for the Return Activated Sludge (RAS).
This is equivalent to 27 ML/day which is equivalent to 314 litres per
second plus 150 litres per second for the RAS.
The total design velocity is therefore 464 litres per second.
|
|
Question With Notice No. 15.2 Potholes
File No: I2018/1037
|
|
At Council’s
Ordinary Meeting held on 24 May 2018, Matthew Lambourne asked the following
question which was taken on notice:
If a pothole 1 metre long by 1.8 metre wide across the
middle of a 4.8m seal is not big enough to be repaired by Council, how much
longer does it need to get before Council will repair it?
Response Director Infrastructure Services:
The issue raised in Mr Matthew Lambourne’s question
has been investigated and has identified inconsistencies in several processes
at Council, both at Mullumbimby office and the depot, as follows:
1. receipt
of hard copy customer request taken at the counter at Mullumbimby office
2. handover
by operational staff when taking leave of completed and uncompleted works
Mr Lambourne lodged hard copy customer request forms at
the customer service area at the Mullumbimby office on two separate occasions
being, 12 April and 4 May 2018.
After the lodgement of the customer request on 12 April
2018:
· CRM
#59822 was created on 12 April, which was initially actioned by depot staff
on 13 April; an inspection undertaken and a defect with a calculated target
date for completion entered into the electronic system, Reflect, used to
manage the identification and accomplishment of such defects.
· The
formal customer request was not saved into Council’s document
management system until 18 April
After the lodgement of the customer request on 4 May 2018:-
· no
additional CRM was raised
· the
formal customer request was saved into the document management system and
viewed by depot staff within five days, where it was determined that a defect
in Reflect had already been raised and a second defect record was not
required.
It is a performance target of the Draft 2018/19 Delivery
Plan and Operational Plan to have all separate customer requests entered into
the CRM system, even if multiple requests are received from the same person
or there are multiple requests about the same matter.
On 21 April 2018, Council’s normal operator of the
pothole patching machine commenced leave and there was an incomplete handover
to the relief operator, who was unaware that all the potholes on Main Arm
Road had not been completed. Unfortunately the relief operator was directed
to other roads to fill potholes not knowing that the large pothole on Main
Arm Road was uncompleted.
Mr Lambourne was advised on Friday 25 May, the day after
the Council meeting, of the two issues that resulted in this pothole being
missed. The pothole was filled on Tuesday 29 May 2018.
The investigation of the issues raised has allowed revised
procedures to be implemented to stop these problems re-occurring in the
future.
|
|
Question With Notice No. 15.3 Report
13.9 of 24 May 2018 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
File No: I2018/1038
|
|
At Council’s
Ordinary Meeting held on 24 May 2018, John Anderson asked the following
question which was taken on notice:
Could either Shannon Burt or Ralph James please
provide:
a) An
explanation of item 13.9 of today’s agenda in terms of what is meant by
“Strict compliance with the provisions of Clause 4.6 will result in no
change to the built form on the site and will merely prevent the sale of
individual dwellings on the allotment”
b) A
legal precedent for allowing variations to development standards far greater
than 10% (i.e. decisions made on upheld by the Land and Environment Court).
c) Some
clue as to the identity of the author of report 13.9.
Response Director Sustainable Environment and
Economy:
a) An
explanation of item 13.9 of today’s agenda in terms of what is meant by
“Strict compliance with the provisions of Clause 4.6 will result in no
change to the built form on the site and will merely prevent the sale of
individual dwellings on the allotment”
Clause 4.6 of the Standard Instrument allows a consent
authority to grant consent to a proposed development “even though the
development would contravene a development standard”. In
circumstances where it applies, clause 4.6 replaces the
power previously found in State
Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development
Standards.
The consent may only be granted if:
· the
applicant has prepared a written request demonstrating that (clause 4.6(3)):
· compliance
with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the
circumstances of the case, and
· there
are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the
development standard; and
· the
consent authority is satisfied that (clause 4.6(4)):
· the
applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters
required to be demonstrated by clause 4.6(3), and
· the
proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent
with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for
development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried
out.
The development standard as varied is the minimum lot size
planning control of 600m2 applicable to this site under LEP 2014 clause 4.1.
The development proposal was deemed compliant with all other built form
controls for a multi dwelling development, except for this. In the
circumstances, following an assessment under clause 4.6, and having regard to
the applicable case law at the time, the variation was deemed acceptable.
Note that determination of clause 4.6 variations over 10% are made by the
council and not staff.
Link below to Department of Planning circular to advise
councils of arrangements for when councils may assume the Secretary’s
concurrence to vary development standards, and clarify requirements around
reporting and record keeping where that concurrence has been assumed.
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/~/media/Files/DPE/Circulars/planning-circular-ps-18-003-variations-to-development-standards-2018-02-21.ashx?la=en
b) A
legal precedent for allowing variations to development standards far greater
than 10% (ie decisions made on upheld by the Land and Environment Court).
It had been widely assumed that the minimum lot size
development standard in clause 4.1 of the Standard Instrument –
Principal Local Environmental Plan (‘Standard LEP‘) does
not apply to strata subdivision.
However the Land and Environment Court held that this
is not the case. Unless the proposed subdivision is of a lot in an existing
strata plan or community development scheme, the proposed subdivision will be
subject to the minimum lot size standard.
The case of DM &
Longbow Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1358 concerned a development application seeking consent to
subdivide an existing two-storey house into two dual occupancy units.
The minimum lot size for the land imposed by clause 4.1 of the Willoughby Local
Environmental Plan 2012 (‘WLEP‘) was 650 m². The
proposed subdivision would have resulted in two strata lots each having
an area of approximately 300m².
The question for the Court was whether the minimum lot
size development standard in clause 4.1 of WLEP applied to the proposed
strata subdivision.
Clause 4.1 of WLEP relevantly provided that:
‘(2) This clause applies to a subdivision
of any land shown on the Lot Size Map that requires development consent and
that is carried out after the commencement of this Plan.
(3) The size of any lot resulting from a
subdivision of land to which this clause applies is not to be less than the
minimum size shown on the Lot Size Map in relation to that land.
…
(4) This clause does not apply in relation to the
subdivision of individual lots in a strata plan or community title
scheme.’
The Applicant submitted that the minimum lot size
development standard contained in clause 4.1(3) of WLEP was not
directed to strata subdivision but rather to the ordinary subdivision of land
and that clause 4.1(4) should be read as applying to the proposed strata
subdivision thus having the effect of making it exempt from
compliance with the minimum lot size development standard.
The Council, on the other hand, argued that
because the definition of ‘subdivision of land‘
contained in s4B (2) (b) of the EPA Act includes ‘the procuring of
the registration in the office of the Registrar-General… of a
strata plan or a strata plan of subdivision‘, it must follow that
the words ‘subdivision of any land‘ appearing in cl4.1 (2)
of WLEP operated to make the proposed strata subdivision subject to the
minimum lot size development standard in clause 4.1(3) of WLEP unless it was
exempted by clause 4.1(4).
Despite some reluctance about the lack of any planning
logic to cl4.1(4), Commissioner Dixon agreed with the Council’s
interpretation.
The Court held that the exemption in clause 4.1(4)
only applies where there is an existing strata plan. A strata plan only comes
into existence when the requirements set out in the Strata Schemes
Development Act 2015 are satisfied. As there was no existing strata plan
in the present case, the proposed strata subdivision did not relevantly
involve the subdivision of any individual lot or lots in a strata plan
within the meaning of clause 4.1(4) of WLEP.
The decision was affirmed on appeal by Preston CJ in
December 2017.
However, the
Standard Instrument – Principal Local Environmental Plan (‘Standard
Instrument‘) has now been amended to clarify that the minimum lot size
development standard does not apply to either the subdivision of land by the
registration of strata or community plans, or the subdivision of lots within
an existing strata or community scheme.
This changes the position back to what many councils
thought the position was before the Court’s decision in Longbow.
However, the Standard Instrument (Local
Environmental Plans) Amendment (Minimum Subdivision Lot Size) Order
2018 (Order) amends clause 4.1 (4) so it states:
This clause does not apply in relation to the
subdivision of any land:
(a) by the registration of a strata plan or strata plan of
subdivision under the Strata Schemes Development Act 2015, or
(b) by any kind of subdivision under the Community Land Development
Act 1989.
This makes it unambiguously clear that the minimum lot
size standard does not apply to a subdivision effected by the registration of
a strata plan or community plan.
The Order also amends clause 4.1AA which continues to
apply to community title schemes in certain zones despite the amended clause 4.1.
Under s 3.20(4) of the Environmental Planning and
Assessment Act 1979, the amended clause 4.1 will immediately be
incorporated into those LEPs around the state which include a declaration
that they adopt the provisions of the Standard LEP. These LEPs will not
require any further amendment to incorporate the amended clause 4.1.
However, the change will not apply to development
applications lodged but not determined before the Order commenced. The Order
commenced on 20 April 2018.
c) Some
clue as to the identity of the author of report 13.9.
Report No. 13.9 PLANNING - State Environmental Planning
Policy No. 1 - Variations to
development standards - 1 October 2017 to 31 December 2017
prepared by Manager Sustainable Development – Chris Larkin.
Report No. 7.7 PLANNING - 10.2017.270.1 Multi dwelling
housing comprising eight (8) dwellings, Strata Title subdivision to create
eight (8) Strata Lots and Common Property and Tree Removal (17 trees) at 6
and 6A Canowindra Court South Golden Beach was reported to the ordinary
meeting of council 28 November 2017 prepared by Team Leader Planning Services
– Greg Smith.
|
|
Question With Notice No. 15.4 Brunswick
Valley STP Overflow
File No: I2018/1080
|
|
Alan Dickens asks
the following question:
With regards to the overflow incidents at the Brunswick
Valley STP in 2012 and 2015, what action and/or repairs were carried out so
this cannot occur again?
Response Director Infrastructure Services:
The walls of the inlet chamber to the UV plant were raised
by 590mm.
This provides two benefits:
· The
top of the chamber is a localised high point and cannot overflow if similar
circumstances presented again; and
· The
increased head provides a self cleaning function for the UV tubes.
The weekly lubrication and inspection maintenance task for
the site was updated to include:
· Check
the UV water tube entrances in the UV feed box for algae etc. blocking
the tubes;
· Sweep
the entry plate clean after any high rainfall/flow event or if dirty; and
· Remove
debris from the feed box.
|
There being no further business the meeting concluded at 4.18pm.
I hereby certify that
these are the true and correct Minutes of this Meeting
as confirmed at
Council’s Ordinary Meeting on 2 August 2018.
….…………………………
Mayor Simon Richardson